The effect of using k.w.l strategy in online class on the meaningful learning of bachelor studentsʼs Arabic language grammar

Articles in Press

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
S. Zare nejad 1
K. Roshanfekr 2
I. Motagizadeh 2
M. Gashmardi 2
1 Tarbiat Modares university
2 Tarbiat modares university
Abstract
The turning increasingly of educational centers to Virtual and online classes shows necessity of paying attention to the quality of training and deep and meaningful learning using modern educational methods in this type of training.This study aims to investigate the effect of k.w.l strategy, which is one of the educational metacognitive strategies and was introduced based on the constructivism theory for deep and meaningful learning by Ogel, in the onlin class of teaching Arabic grammar,to asses the effectiveness of this strategy in meaningful and deep learning of Arabic grammar.The study used Quasi-experimental method with pre and post test on the control and experimental groups who were trained virtually. statistical population included 34 students in the first semester of the bachelor at Khwarizmi public University in(1400). The sample was selected by the available method and then randomly divided into two groups .Data analysis was done by(spss). In order to determine the presence or absence of influence between variables and to estimate and generalize the results obtained from the sample size to the statistical population,the combined analysis of covariance or repeated measures test(GLMRM)was used to assess and evaluate the research data. According to results, average of pre-test scores of the Arabic grammar variables in the control and experimental groups are 2.40 and 2.04,respectively, and these averages in the post-test of these groups are reported 2.55 and 3.01 respectively,so there is a significant difference betyeen pre-test and post-test.so we see a significant increase in the grammar average in the experimental groupʼs post-test.

Keywords

Subjects

Abu Raihan, M & Seung Loc, H. (2012). Technology Integration for Meaningful Learning–the Constructivist View. Bangladesh Education Journal, 11(1), p.17-37.
Betancur, M & King, G. G. (2014). Using mind mapping as a method to help ESL/EFL students connect vocabulary and concepts in different contexts. TRILOGÍA. Ciencia. Tecnología y Sociedad, 10. P. 69-85.
Dabbagh, N. & et al. (2019). meaningful online learning. new York: Routledge.
Fatmawan, A.R. & et al. (2023). The Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy to Improve Narrative Text in Junior High School Student. Jurnal of English Development, 3(2), p. 80-89.
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction, new York: oxford university press.
Mystakidis, S. &et al. (2019). The Patras Blended Strategy Model for Deep and Meaningful Learning in Quality Life-Long Distance Education. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, ACPIR, P. 66-78.
Mystakidis, S. & et al. (2021). Deep and Meaningful E-Learning with Social Virtual Reality Environments in Higher Education, A Systematic Literature Review, p.1-25.
Naidu, s. (2003). e-learning, A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices, india: new dehli.
Nurul Asri, A. (2014). Implementing KWL strategy in teaching reading for non-english department students. The 61 TEFLIN International Conference. UNS Solo malang, P. 477-480.
Sinambela, E. & et al. (2015). Improving Students’Reading Comprehension Achievement by Using K-W-L Strategy. English Linguistics Research, 3(4). P.13-26.
Tierney, R.J. & readence, J. E. (2005). reading sterategies and practices a comprehention. USA: person.
Widyari, N. K. R. & et.Al. (2022). Teaching Reading with KWL Strategy during Online Learning. JOES journal of educational study, 2(10), p. 177-186.
Williams, J. D. (2005). The Teacher’s Grammar Book. Londen: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Translated references
Abdul Majeed, H. And Alani, M. (2015) Interactive e-learning, Amman: Academic Book Center.
Abu Ajama, c. (2019). The effect of using the previous and acquired knowledge strategy in developing critical thinking skills in the subject of the Arabic language for ninth grade students in Jordan. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 3 (31).
Abu Al-Haj, S. and Mosalehe, h. (2016). Active learning strategies. Dubai: Dibonu Center for Thinking.
Abu Amsha, K. and Degran. (2017). Training guide of teaching the Arabic language skills and its elements to non-native speakers, theory and practice. Riyadh: Dar Al-Wojooh for publication and clarification.
Aghazadeh, M. (2018). New teaching methods. Tehran: Aizh.
Al-Harbi, F. (2021). The effect of using the k.W.L strategy on the academic achievement of sixth grade students in Arabic grammar in the Qassim region. The Arab Journal for Scientific Publication ((AJSP, 4 (36). 469-481.
Attia, M. (2009). Comprehensive and new quality in teaching, Amman: Dar Al-Safa for publishing.
Brown, h. d. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. Translated by A. Chegini(2016). Tehran: Rahnama.
Davaliti- Myanduab, A. & Et al. (2017). The effect of KWL educational strategy on students' academic motivation and academic progress in religion and life. Educational Leadership and Management Quarterly, 3(12), 109-122.
Yahiavi Farkoosh, M. and Pourzahedi Farkoosh, A. (2016). Virtual and electronic training. 1, Tehran: SACO.
Language Related Research

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 13 July 2025