Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008
Appel, R., Geluso, J., & Feng, H. H. (2024). An examination of phrase-frames in L2 English academic writing: Exploring relationships with writing quality. System, 123, Article e103349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103349
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). The state of h index research: Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.233
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69, 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
Crawford, W. J., & Csomay, E. (2016). Doing corpus linguistics. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003363309
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
Flowerdew, J. (2009). Goffman’s stigma and EAL writers: The author responds to Casanave. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.01.001
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus‐based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(1), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D. (2019). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 646-674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). General orientation. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 2-24). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. Continuum.
Harzing, A. W., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(2), 16569-16572.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001
Kim, G. M. (2020). Challenging native speakerism in literacy research and education. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(3), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20939
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine‐grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lei, L., Wen, J., & Yang, X. (2023). A large-scale longitudinal study of syntactic complexity development in EFL writing: A mixed-effects model approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, Article e100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962
Liu, Y., & Li, T. (2024). Comparing the syntactic complexity of plain language summaries and abstracts: A case study of marine science academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, Article e101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101350
Lu, Q., Yao, Y., Xiao, L., Yuan, M., Wang, J., & Zhu, X. (2024). Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 616-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2301722
Lu, X. (2025). Meaning and function dimensions of linguistic complexity in second language writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), Article e100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100191
Manning, C. D. (2015). Computational linguistics and deep learning. Computational Linguistics, 41(4), 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00239
Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, 55-60.
Marti, L., Yilmaz, S., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). Reporting research in applied linguistics: The role of nativeness and expertise. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.005
Martin, J. R. (1991). Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social semiotics, 1(1), 99-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339109360331
Nguyen, P. (2024). Noun phrase complexity in English integrated writing placement test responses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 72, Article e101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101452
Ortega, L. (2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact (pp. 127–155). Mouton de Gruyter. doi.org/10.1515/9783110229226.127
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
Phyo, W. M., Nikolov, M., & Hódi, Á. (2024). What support do international doctoral students claim they need to improve their academic writing in English? Ampersand, 12, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100161
Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003
Römer, U., & Arbor, A. (2009). English in academia: Does nativeness matter. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20(2), 89-100.
Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.001
Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. John Benjamins Publishing.
Shin, Y. (2019). Do native writers always have a head start over nonnative writers? The use of lexical bundles in college students' essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.04.004Get rights and content
Shirazizadeh, M., & Amirfazlian, R. (2021). Lexical bundles in theses, articles and textbooks of applied linguistics: Investigating intradisciplinary uniformity and variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, Article e100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100946
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D. Z. (2013). What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.91
Teixeira, M. C., Thomaz, S. M., Michelan, T. S., Mormul, R. P., Meurer, T., Fasolli, J. V. B., & Silveira, M. J. (2013). Incorrect citations give unfair credit to review authors in ecology journals. PLoS One, 8(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081871
United States Census Bureau. (2014). Frequently occurring surnames from Census 1990. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/1990_census/1990_census_namefiles.html.
Vanclay, J. K. (2008). Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.002
Wang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2021). According to ... : The impact of language background and writing expertise on textual priming patterns of multi-word sequences in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.08.005
Wang, Y., & Jiang, J. (2024). Exploring the development of noun phrase complexity in L2 English writings across two genres. Assessing Writing, 62, Article e100892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100892
Warren, L. K., & Sato, M. (2024). Multilingualism and native speakerism in academic journals’ language policies: Exploring a potential power of applied linguistics journals in promoting equitable publishing practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(3), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000068
Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71-83). Cambridge University Press.
Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798
Zhao, H., Dang, T. N. Y., & Finlayson, N. (2025). Education lecturers’ expectations about writing proficiency: Insights from corpus analysis of teacher feedback on academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101173
جستارهای زبانی