Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Brauer, K., & Proyer, R.T. (2020). Dyadic effects. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1222–1226). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_656-1
Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., & Proyer, R. T. (2022). A primer on studying effects of relationship duration in dyadic research: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(7), 2117–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221074677
Boker, S. M., & McArdle, J. J. (2005). Path analysis and path diagrams. In B. S. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1529–1531). John Wiley & Sons.
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
Derakhshan, A. (2022a). Revisiting research on positive psychology in second and foreign language education: Trends and directions. Language Related Research, 13(5), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.5.1
Derakhshan, A. (2022b). The “5Cs” positive teacher interpersonal behaviors: Implications for learner empowerment and learning in an L2 Context. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/9783031165276
Dewaele, J., Botes, E., & Greiff, S. (2022). Sources and effects of foreign language enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom: A structural equation modeling approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000328
Dewaele, J. M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., and Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Phychology. https://doi.org/10:2128. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 263-286). Routledge.
de Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.001
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2020). The dynamics of foreign language enjoyment: An ecological momentary assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01391
Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., Yazdanmenhr, E. (2021). Foreign language enjoyment: A longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis-curve of factors model. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1874392
Elahi Shirvan, M., & Talebzadeh, N. (2020). Tracing the signature dynamics of foreign language classroom anxiety and foreign language enjoyment: A retrodictive qualitative modeling. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710194
Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2018). Emotion transmission in the classroom revisited: A reciprocal effects model of teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 628–639.
Gistelinck, F., & Loeys, T. (2019). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model for longitudinal dyadic data: An implementation in the SEM framework. Structural Equation Modeling, 26, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1527223
Hareli, S., Halhal, M., & Hess, U. (2018). Dyadic Dynamics: The Impact of Emotional Responses to Facial Expressions on the Perception of Power. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hellermann, J., & Cole, E. (2008). Practices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30(20), 186–215, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn032
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2019). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Multilingual Matters.
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van de Schoot, R. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jang, H., & Cheung, Y. L. (2020). Impacts of dyadic interaction on second language writing: A study with eight bilingual primary school students in Singapore, Education 3-13, 48:5, 527–540, https://10.1080/03004279.2019.1624804
Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Burt, S. A., & McGue, M. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins' conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.316
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.S., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.204
Kruk, M., Elahi Shirvan, M., Pawlak, M., Taherian, T., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2021). A longitudinal study of the subdomains of boredom in practical English language classes in an online setting: A factor of curves latent growth modeling. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.2006404
Kruk, M., Elahi Shirvan, M., Pawlak, M., Taherian, T., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2022a). Potential sources of foreign language learning boredom: A Q methodology study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1). 3758. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.3
Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831408
Lee, T.K., Wickrama, K.A.S., & O'Neal, C.W. (2021). Modeling longitudinal dyadic processes in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 35, 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000862
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00194
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127>. Psychological Methods, 11, 127–141.
Peng, J., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
Planalp, E. M., Du, H., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., & Wang, L. (2017). Growth curve modeling to studying change: A comparison of approaches using longitudinal dyadic data with distinguishable dyads. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1224088
Silberg, J. L., Erickson, M. T., Meyer, J. M., Eaves, L. J., Rutter, M. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (1994). The application of structural equation modeling to maternal ratings of twins' behavioral and emotional problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 510–521.
Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 37. 305–322. 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00007-7.
Wang, Y., L., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721.
Wang, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Enhancing Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ willingness to attend classes: The role of teacher confirmation and caring. Porta Linguarum, 39(1):165-192. http://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.23625
Wang, Y., & Guan, H. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Rev. Argent. Clin. Psicol. 29, 851–861. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2020.116.
Wang, Y., Pan, Z. W., & Wang, M. Z. (2023). The moderating effect of participation in online learning on EFL teachers’ teaching ability. Heliyon, 9(3)e13890: 1-12. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13890.
Wang, Y. (2023). Probing into the boredom of online instruction among Chinese English language teachers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Current Psychology, 43(1):1-15.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04223-3.
Wang, R., Elahi Shirvan, M., Taherian, T., & Solhi, M. (2023). Longitudinal Reciprocal Relationship between Language Teachers’ Trait Emotional Intelligence and their Learner’s Trait Emotional Intelligence: A Dyadic Curve of Factors Model. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-15. Available at https://journals.iau.ir/article_695343.html
Whittaker, T. A., Beretvas, S. N., & Falbo, T. (2014). Dyadic Curve-of-Factors Model: An Introduction and Illustration of a Model for Longitudinal Non-Exchangeable Dyadic Data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882695
Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Yu, M. (2011). Effect of communication variables, affective variables, and teacher immediacy on willingness to communicate of foreign language learners. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2011.565678
جستارهای زبانی