از استعارۀ پیرسی تا نماد عرفانی: الگویی متفاوت در تفسیر نشانه‌های زبان عرفان

- Anderson, Douglas (1984). Peirce on Metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. 20. No. 4 (Fall, 1984).453-468.
- Colapietro, Vincent., Olshewsky, Thomas (editors). (1995). Peirce's Doctrine of Signs. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Feodorov, Aleksandar. (2018). Peirce's Garden Of Forking Metaphors. Sign Systems Studies, 46 (2/3). 188-215.
- Frankenberry, Nancy, k. (1999). On The very Idea of Symbolic Meaning .in. Chapman & Frankenberry (ed.) Interpreting Neville (93-110). New York: State University of New York Press.
- Haley, Micheal C. (1998). The Semeiosis Of Poetic Metaphor Peirce Studies. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- Hwan Lee, Ji. (2018). Integration mechanism & transcendental semiosis. Semiotica, 225. 57-76.
- Jungk, Isabel. (2020). Metaphoric Semiosis: a Peircean Perspective. Estud Ling., Belo Horizonte, v.28, n. 2. 957-980.
- Neville, Robert, C. (1996). The Truth of Broken Symbols. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Oehler, Klaus. (1987). Is A Transcendental Semiotics Possible? A Peircian Consideration. Transactoins Of The Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol. 23, No. 1. 45-63.
- Peirce, Charles S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Vols.1-6, Hartshorne, Charles; Weiss, Paul (eds.), 1931-1935. Vols. 7-8, Burks, A. W. (ed.) 1958].
- Shook, John.R. (2016). Panentheism & Peirce's God. Philosophy Theology and the Sciences, 3(1). 8-31.
- Sonesson, Gøran. (2008). The Varieties of Interpretation. A View from Semiotics. Galaxia (Sao Paulo), 2(4). 67-99.