A Methodological Synthesis of Research Articles in the English for Specific Purposes’s Lifespan

Document Type : Research article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Department of Language and Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Fereshtegaan International Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Yasouj University & Shiraz University, Iran
Abstract
This research synthesized the methodological issues of studies published in English for Specific Purposes from its debut in 1980 up to 2020, from both an overall perspective and also periodically in four decades. To this aim, we examined 617 empirical articles with regard to two themes: (a) research methodology, and (b) data sources. More specifically, we probed into the methodological designs, how they were integrated and the points of departure in qualitative research. Our results brought to the fore that the majority of ESP articles were framed as combined methods studies, most frequently concurrent designs, dominated by qualitative data and data collection. As well, about half of qualitative studies did not specify their approach and the majority of quantitative works utilized descriptive statistics and combinations of different tests. Pertaining to data sources, text samples as well as an amalgamation of different data collection techniques were the most prominent ones. Based on these results and discussion, we provided empirically–grounded recommendations and suggestions for promoting methodological transparency and rigor for the prospective studies for the field of ESP and applied linguistics in general.



 

Keywords

Subjects


Arnó-Macià, E., Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Tatzl, D. (2020). Engineering students' perceptions of the role of ESP courses in internationalized universities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.12.001
Author and others (2020).
Author and others (2022).
Author and others (2023a).
Author and others (2023b).
Author and others (2023c).
Author and others (2023d).
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Auckland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Basturkmen, H. & Elder, C. (2004). The practice of LSP. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The
handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 672-694). Oxford: Blackwell.
Belcher, D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. English for specific purposes in theory and practice, 1-20.
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Routledge.
Benson, P. (2013). Qualitative methods: Overview. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied
linguistics (pp. 1-10). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997-2006. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 79-90.
Bruce, I. (2009). Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for specific Purposes, 28(2), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
Canagarajah, S. (2016). TESOL as a professional community: A half‐century of pedagogy, research, and theory. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (1), 7-41.
Caplan, N. A., & Stevens, S. G. (2017). “Step Out of the Cycle”: Needs, challenges, and successes of international undergraduates at a US University. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.003
Casanave, C. P. (2005). Uses of narrative in L2 writing research. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 17-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Covey, S. R. (2012). Style Guide for Business and Technical Communication (5th ed). FT Press and Pearson Education.
Dudley-Evans, T., St John, M. J., & Saint John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Duff, P. A. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 34, 233-255.
Gao, Y., Li. L., & Lu, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 1-14.
Gollin-Kies, S. (2014). Methods reported in ESP research articles: A comparative survey of two leading journals. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 27-34.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
Harklau, L. (2011). Approaches and methods in recent qualitative research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 175-189). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hewings, M. (2002). A history of ESP through English for specific purposes. English for Specific Purposes World, 1(3), 1-7.
Howatt, A. & Richard, S. (2014). The History of teaching English as a Foreign language, from a British and European perspective. Language and History, 57 (1), 75-95.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-center approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Hyland, K. (2013). ESP and Writing. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 95-114), Wiley-Blackwell.
Hyland, K. (2016a). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Hyland, K. (2016b). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Hyland, K. (2022). English for Specific Purposes: What is it and where is it taking us? ESP Today, 10, (2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.1
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021a). A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100929.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021b). Delivering relevance: The emergence of ESP as a discipline. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 13-25.
Johns, A. M. (2013). The history of English for specific purposes research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, (pp. 5-30). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Journal of English for Specific Purposes. (n.d.). About the journal. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/english-for-specific-purposes/about/aims-and-scope.
Kim, J., Kim, E. G., & Kweon, S. O. (2018). Challenges in implementing English-medium instruction: Perspectives of Humanities and Social Sciences professors teaching engineering students. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.005
Lew, S., Yang, A. H., & Harklau, L. (2018). Qualitative methodology. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa,
L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.). The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 79-101). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Li, S. (2019). Communicative significance of vague language: A diachronic corpus-based study of legislative texts. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.11.001
Lillis, T., & Tuck, J. (2016). Academic literacies. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 30-43). London: Routledge.
Liu, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Mapping the field of English for specific purposes (1980-2018): A co-citation
analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 97-116.
Matsuda, P. K. (2005). Historical inquiry in second language writing. In P. K. Matsuda, & T. Silva (Eds.). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction, (pp. 33-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Research in Practice Examples for Discussion and Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Min, H. T. (2008). Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training. English for specific purposes, 27(3), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002
Pelaez-Morales, C. (2017). Short communication: L2 writing scholarship in JSLW: An updated report of research published between 1992-2015. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 9-19.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000231
Resurchify. (n.d.). Journal of English for specific purposes. Retrieved from https://www.resurchify.com/impact/details/20598
Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv064
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135-173.
Riazi, A. M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the Journal of Second Language Writing at its 25th year (1992–2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.002
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(2), 147-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005612
Slomp, D. H. (2019). Complexity, consequence, and frames: A quarter century of research in Assessing Writing. Assessing Writing, 42, 100424.
Staples, S., Kang, O., & Wittner, E. (2014). Considering interlocutors in university discourse communities: Impacting US undergraduates’ perceptions of ITAs through a structured contact program. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.02.002
Stapleton, P., & Shao, Q. (2018). Research in language teaching over two decades: A retrospective of the first 20 volumes of Language Teaching Research. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 350-369.
Starfield, S. (2013). The historical development of languages for specific purposes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1-6). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Swales, J. (1988). Episodes in ESP (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Swales, J. (2020). ESP serial publications before The ESP Journal/English for Specific Purposes: Recollections and reflections of an old-timer. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.002
Tadros, A. A. (1989). Predictive categories in university textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 8(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(89)90004-5
Wette, R. (2019). Embedded provision to develop source-based writing skills in a Year 1 health sciences course: How can the academic literacy developer contribute?. English for Specific Purposes, 56, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.07.002
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2019). What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Writing (2000-2018). Assessing Writing, 42, 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100421