The Anthropocene and The Absence of Fixed Narration Structures: The Semiotics of Narration in Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation

نوع مقاله : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده
Hossein Mohseni
Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
10.48311/LRR.15.5.173
چکیده
In Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation, the way the Anthropocenic set of circumstances is narrated could not be easily explained away through giving precedence to either materialist or structuralist narratologists. In this sense, neither the materiality of the environment nor the arbitrary categories and models of structuralists such as Greimas could determine the ultimate narratological scheme with which one could make sense out of such set of circumstances. Only through modifying the extant narratological categories and models and exposing their arbitrariness via indicating their incapability to contain the formidable materiality of the environment, one could reach a workable semiotic framework for devising a narrative out of the anthropocenic set of circumstances. Reaching this framework would be the present study’s research objective. As its findings, the study recognizes that such a framework would not give the agency of devising narration to either non-human/environmental or human entities in the anthropocene, and at the same time will be the result of the uneasy, yet workable, coupling of these entities. This framework would also acknowledge the uncontainable nature of the environment in the anthropocene, and turn both human and non-human entities into mere actants that have no particular motivation. The study uses the modified narratological models of Algirdas Greimas and Amitav Gosh proposed by critics like Hanes Bergthaller, Marco Caracciolo and Jean Paul Petitimbert to reach this semiotic framework.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

Alksnis, M. (2018). The weird idexicality of climate change: Sign interpretation from inside a hyperobject. In D. Martinelli (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th world congress of the international association for semiotic studies (pp. 179-186). International Semiotics Institute Kaunas University of Technology.
Bergthaller, H. (2017). Climate change and un-narratability. Metaphora, 1-12.
Caracciolo, M. (2018). Notes for an econarratological theory of character. Frontiers of Narrative Studies, 4(1), 172-189.
Hegglund, J. (2020). Unnatural narratology and weird realism in Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation. In E. James and E. Morel (eds.), Environment and narrative new directions in econarratology (pp. 27-44). The Ohio State University Press.
James, E. and E. Morel (2020). Notes toward New econarratologies. In E. James and E. Morel (eds.), Environment and narrative new directions in econarratology (pp. 1-24). The Ohio State University Press.
Margeson, C. (2018). Imaging the anthropocene: The weird ecology of Jeff VanderMeer’s Southern Reach Trilogy (MA dissertation). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/368557/MA%20Literature%20Today%20Thesis%20-%20Chris%20Margeson.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Petitimbert, J.P. (2017). Anthropocenic park: Humans and non-humans in socio-semiotic interaction. Actes Sémiotiques, 1-17.
Prendergast, F.A. (2017). Reviewing inhuman ethics in Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation. Contemporary Literature, 58(3), 333–360.
Robertson, B. (2018). None of this is normal: The fiction of Jeff VanderMeer. Minneapolis, Min: University of Minnesota Press.
Strombeck, A. (2019). Inhuman writing in Jeff VanderMeer’s Southern Reach Trilogy. Textual Practice, 34(8), 1–18.
VanderMeer, J. (2014). Annihilation. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Vermeulen, P. (2020). Literature and the anthropocene. New York, NY: Routledge.
Westhauser, F. and H. Stuit. (2021). The hospitable parasite: Parasitic networks in Jeff VanderMeer’s Southern Reach Trilogy. ISLE: Interdisciplinary studies in literature and environment, 28(3), 1–20.
جستارهای زبانی
دوره 15، شماره 5 - شماره پیاپی 83
آذر و دی 1403
صفحه 173-196