The Study of the Persian Compound Words Ending in the Verb Stem "bast" from the Viewpoint of Construction Morphology

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 PhD. in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan.
2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan
Abstract
Employing Construction Morphology (CM), the present study aims to examine the Persian compound words, ending in the verb stem “bast”. The data is comprised of 51 compound words and 1791 attested sentences. The latter body of data comes from various reliable sources, including the diachronic corpus of Farhangyar-e Zaban-e Farsi, the synchronic corpus of Persian Language Database, Bijankhan Corpus, Iranian Geographical Dictionary, Zansou Dictionary (1372), Dehkhoda Dictionary (1377), Persian Wikipedia webpage, and Google webpages. The findings suggest that semantic variations of these compounds figure in the concepts of Action, Location, and Instrument. Accordingly, the dominating schema and sub-schemas of theses words, and their relations are described. The study also suggests that approximation- along with metaphoric and metonymic extensions- has a role in the expansion of the schema.



1. Introduction

Compounding is recognized as one of the most productive word formation processes in many languages (Haspelmath, 2002). Likewise, in Persian, compounding refers to a predominant morphological process. This study analyzes the compounding structure represented through the underlying conceptual construction [X-past stem of the verb]. In this construction, a nonverbal element is combined with an adjective, a verb, or a noun, producing compound words such as 'darbast,' 'pishkharid,' 'salkhord,' 'adamizad,' 'dastpokht,' and 'rahavard.' In Persian morphology, the schematic construction [x-bast] has appeared to be one of the most productive constructions. This construction allows for the categorical distinctions and semantic variations of the compound words based on [x-bast] structure.

Research Question(s)

The present study addresses the following research questions:

1. What semantic variations can be observed in the Persian compound words ending in past verbal stem [bast]?

2. What schematic construction underlies the [x-bast] structure?



2. Literature Review

There is a vast body of scholarly work in the literature addressing word formation processes in Persian. What is more, a massive body of literature that is concerned with the formation of the structure of compound words in Persian, including Kalbasi (1992), Asii (1992), Maghrebi (1993), Dabir Moghadam (1997), Mahoutian (1999), Sadeghi (2004), Tabatabai (2002, 2003, 2006, 2007), Khabaz (2007), and Shaghaghi (2007). However, only scant attention has been directed toward the study of semantic variations and schema of compound words in Persian including, Imani et al. (2017), Imani and Rafiei (2018), Azimdokht et al. (2017), Azimdokht and Rafiei, (2018), and Azimdokht (2018).

3. Methodology

This research is designed based on a descriptive-analytical approach. The analyses are carried out using both diachronic and synchronic corpora. Following the collection and categorization of data, we examined the semantic variations and the cognitive mechanisms underlying these variations. Ultimately, we presented the schematic structure [X-past stem of the verb “bast”] In so doing, we utilized Constructional Morphology (Booij, 2010) and the variation continuum (Heine et.al., 1991), as our theoretical and analytical frameworks to analyze the data and examine the semantic structures along with their variations. The dataset for this study is comprised of compound words ending in the past stem “bast”. We collected the data from various resources including the Farhangyar Persian language corpus, the Persian language database, the Bijan-Khan corpus, the Iranian Geographical Dictionary, the Zansou Dictionary (1993), the Dehkhoda Dictionary (1998), and the Persian Wikipedia webpage. Additionally, the Google search engine was employed to identify neologisms resulting from the [x-stem “bast”] construction."



4. Results

The analysis of 51 compound words ending in the stem 'bast' and 1,791 attested sentences reveals that the semantic variations of words within this morphological pattern reveal in terms of action nouns, locative nouns, and instrumental nouns. Interestingly, the formation of these semantic variations is mainly triggered through metaphorical extensions. Furthermore, employing Booij's (2010) polysemy framework alongside the variation continuum (Heine et.al., 1991), the study suggested that ‘ACTION’ serves as the primary underlying meaning associated with this construction, encompassing both spatial and instrumental dimensions. Subsequently, this conceptual meaning facilitates the emergence of other branches of the construction. The schemas and sub-schemas related to this construction indicate that the process of approximation in forming sub-schemas and the extension of this construction have been effective in the use of new compound words

Keywords

Subjects


ایمانی، آ. رفیعی، عادل. عموزاده، محمد. (1397). «تحلیلی ساخت محور از ترکیبات نام‌اندام «دل» در زبان فارسی». پژوهش‌های زبانی. سال 9. شماره 2. پاییز و زمستان. ص 23-44.
ایمانی، آ. رفیعی، ع. (1398). «تحلیلی ساخت محور از ترکیبات نام‌اندام «سر» در زبان فارسی». زبان پژوهی. سال یازدهم. شماره 33. زمستان. ص 129- 159.
خباز، م. (1386). جایگاه هسته در کلمات مرکب غیرفعلی فارسی. دستور. شماره 2. ص 153- 167.
دبیرمقدم، م. (1376). فعل مرکب در زبان فارسی. مجله زبانشناسی. سال دوازدهم. شماره 1 و 2. پیاپی 23 و 24. ص 2-24.
شقاقی، ویدا . (1386). انضمام در زبان فارسی. فصلنامه فرهنگستان ( ویژه نامه فرهنگستان). شماره 3. دوره 3. ص 3- 29.
عاصی، م (1371). نقش ترکیب در گسترش واژگان زبان فارسی با نگرشی بر آثار نظامی گنجوی. مجله فرهنگ. شماره 10. پاییز. ص 297 – 316.
عظیم‌دخت، ذ. رفیعی، ع. (1398). «واژه‌های مرکب مختوم به ستاک حال «پز» با مفهوم عامل محور از منظر صرف ساختی». پژوهش‌های زبانشناسی تطبیقی. سال نهم. شماره 17. بهار و تابستان. ص 19- 47.
عظیم‌دخت، ذ. (1398). بررسی کلمات مرکب مختوم به ستاک حال در زبان فارسی از منظر صرف ساختی، پایان‌نامه دکتری. دانشگاه اصفهان.
صادقی، ع. (1383). «کلمات مرکب ساخته شده با ستاک فعل». نامه فرهنگستان (ویژه نامه دستور). جلد اول. ش 1: 5-12.
طباطبایی، ع. (1382). اسم و صفت در زبان فارسی. دانش 103. 53- 59.
طباطبایی، علاالدین. (1382). اسم و صفت مرکب در زبان فارسی. تهران. نشر دانشگاهی.
طباطبایی، ع. (1385). تغییر مقوله در زبان فارسی. دستور 2. 32-37.
طباطبایی، ع. (1386). ترکیب در زبان فارسی1. نامه فرهنگستان. شماره 35. صص 186-196.
طباطبایی، ع.(1389). «ترکیب در زبان فارسی 6. نامه فرهنگستان». سال یازدهم. شماره 3. پیاپی 43.صص 150-165.
کشانی، خسرو. (1372). فرهنگ زانسو، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
کلباسی، ایران. (1371). ساخت اشتقاقی واژه در فارسی امروز. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
ماهوتیان، شهرزاد. (1378). دستور زبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده‌شناسی. ترجمه مهدی سمائی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
مقربی، مصطفی. (1372). ترکیب در زبان فارسی. انتشارات توس.
Azimdokht, Z. Rafiei, A. (2021). Words Ending in the stem of “paz” with the concept of agent-base in construction morphology. Comparative linguistics research. Volume 9. Issue 17. Spring and summer. Pp. 19-47
Booij.G. (2005). The Grammar of Words:( 1st edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
.............. (2007). The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Second Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
................ (2008), "Construction morphology and the lexicon". In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, and N. Hathout (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
………….. (2009). “Compound Construction: Schemas or Analogy? A Construction Morphology Perspective”. To appear in Sergio Scalise and Irene Vogel (eds). Compounding. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
……….. . (2009). “Compounding and Construction morphology”. Oxford handbook of compounding. Pp. 201-216). Oxford University Press.
………... (2010). Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass.
………... (2012). “Construction morphology, a brief introduction”, Morphology 22, 343-346.
………... (2015), "Construction Morphology", In. A. Hippisley & G. T. Stump (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, 424-448. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard and Sandra A. Thompson.(1985). Lexical nominalization. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 349−398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2007). Construction grammar In D. Geeraerts & H.Cuyckens (eds). Cognitive Linguistics, 463-508. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, Bernard and Sandra A. Thompson.(1985). Lexical nominalization. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 349−398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downing, Pamela. (1977). “On the creation and use of English compound nouns”. Language 53. 810-842.
Grimshaw, Jane.(1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Construction: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grimshaw, Jane.(1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
Heini, B., Claudi, U. and H_nnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2015). Action nouns. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:874866.
Lieber, R. (2010). Introducing morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luschützky, H. Ch.; Rainer, F. (2013). Instrument and place nouns: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics, 51, 1301-1359.
Imani, A. Rafiei, A. Amoozadeh, Mohammad. (2019). Construction-based analysis of the compounds of the “heart” in Persian Language. Journal of language research. Volume 9. Issue 2. Autumn and Winter
Imani, A. Rafiei, A. (2020). Construction-based analysis of the compounds of the “head” in Persian Language. Language studies. Volume 11. Issue 33. Winter
Kalbasi, I. (1994). Derivative construction of the word in Persian. Tehran: Institute for humanities and cultural studies
Keshani, kh. (1995). Reverse Dictionary. Tehran: University Publication Center
Janda, L. (2014). “Metonymy and word-formation revisited”. Cognitive Linguistics. 25 (2), 341-349. https:doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0008
Maghrebi, M. (1995). Compound in Persian Language. Toos Publication
Meyer-Lubke, W. (1890). Italienische Grammatik. Leipzig: Reis land
Rainer, F. (2005). Noms d'instruments/ de lieux en –tor dans la Galloromania, Vox Romanica, 64, 121- 140.
(1991). Morphological Theory. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Sadeghi, A. (2006). Compound words made with stem of verb. Farhangestan . Issue 1. Pp.5-12.
Whitney, W.D. (1879). A Sanskrit Grammar. Leipzig: Breit Kopf and Hartel.