Afrilyasanti, R., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). A sudden shift: Students’, teachers’, and adaptation to learning during and after COVID-19 learning. PEGEGOG, 12(2), 143-150. https://dx.doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.14
Alakrash, H., & Razak, N. A. (2020). Towards the education 4.0, readiness level of EFL students in utilizing technology-enhanced classroom. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(10), 161-182. https://ww.ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_10/131012_Alakrash_2020_E_R.pdf
Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2022) Distance learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: School closure in Indonesia, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1934-1954. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1875072
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Cahyono, B. Y., Khotimah, K., Batunan, D. A., & Imamyartha, D. (2022). Workable approaches in EFL teaching mediated by mobile technology during the pandemic and post-pandemic: Indonesian EFL teachers’ experiences and expectations. CALL-EJ, 24, 138-159. http://www.callej.org/journal/24-1/Cahyono-Khotimah-Batunan-Imamyartha2023.pdf
Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons Publishing.
Carstens, K. J., Mallon, J. M., Bataineh, M., & Al-Batainehh, A. (2021). Effects of technology on student learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 105-113. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290791.pdf
Chung, H-H., Chen, S-C., & Kuo, M-H. (2015). A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479
Dang, T. (2012). Learner autonomy: A synthesis of theory and practice. The Internet Journal of Language, Culture, and Society, 35(1), 52-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298092439_Learner_autonomy_A_synthesis_of_theory_and_practice
Darmawansah, & Indartono, S. (2019). The influence of instructional Syntax to engage EFL students in the online learning environment. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 121-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.337
Edumadze, J., Ditlhokwa, G., & Demuyakor, J. (2022). Students’ acceptance and perceptions of perceived usefulness of mobile learning devices in higher educational institutions. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(2), e202209. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11539
Francis, W. N. (1958). The structure of American English (Ch. 6, Grammar Part II: Syntactic Structures). New York: The Ronald Press Company.
Ginting, D., Djiwandono, P. I., Woods, R., & Lee, D. (2021). Is autonomous learning possible for Asian students? The story of a MOOC from Indonesia. Teaching English with Technology, 20(1), 60-79. https://tewtjournal.org/download/5-is-autonomous-learning-possible-for-asian-students-the-story-of-a-mooc-from-indonesia-by-daniel-ginting-patrisius-istiarto-djiwandono-ross-woods-and-debra-lee/
Hsieh, J. S. C., & Huang, Y-M., & Wu, W-C. V. (2017). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
Kapfer, P. G., Kapfer, M. B., & Woodruff, A. D. (1976). Declining test scores: Interpretations, issues, and relationship to life-based education. Educational Technology, 16(7), 5–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44418121
Kasim, U., Muslem, A., Mustafa, F., & Ibrahim, H. (2024). TPACK, English proficiency, and technology applications in pre-service English teacher professional development teaching practice. Language Related Research, 15(5), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.15
Khotimah, K., Widiati, U., Mustofa, M., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2019). Autonomous English learning: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20234
Khulaifiyah, K., Widati, U., Anugerahwati, M., & Suryati, N. (2021). Autonomous learning activities: The perceptions of English language students in Indonesia. PEGEGOG, 11(3), 34–49. https://mail.pegegog.net/index.php/pegegog/article/view/1362
Kiu, V. L., Tran, P. D. B., Nga, V. T. T., & Ho, P. V. P. (2021). The effectiveness of using technology in learning English. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(2), 24-40. https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/26
Loyless, S. D., & Shaw, E. C. (2020). Beyond retreat and rebellion: Building teacher capacity for optimized student engagement and agency. In Leveraging technology to improve school safety and student wellbeing (pp. 227-243). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1766-6.ch013
Matsumoto, S., Shibata, K., & Hattori, A. (2020). Mobile technology of learning and communication for students with disabilities. Tokyo: IGI Global Publishers. https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1400-9.ch012
Mizher, R., Amoush, K. H., & Wreikat, A. A. (2022). EFL students’ attitudes towards using online learning during Covid-19: Applying technology acceptance model. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(2), 88-103. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.6
Muslimin, A. I., Wulandari, I., & Widiati, U. (2022). Flipgrid for speaking success: Unearthing EFL students’ attitudes and anxiety level in distance learning. Pedagogika, 145(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2022.145.3
Muslimin, A. I., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2023). TPACK-SAMR digital literacy competence, technostress, and teaching performance: Correlational study among EFL lecturers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), e409. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12921
Muslimin, A. I., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2024). Evaluating Cami AI across SAMR stages: Students’ achievement and perceptions in EFL writing instruction. Online Learning, 28(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4246
Nguyen, H., & Terry, D. R. (2017). English learning strategies among EFL learners: A narrative approach. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.22492/IJLL.3.1.01
Octaberlina, L. R., & Muslimin, A. I. (2021). Online learning: Students’ autonomy and attitudes. Xlinguae, 14(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2021.14.01.04
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 25-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Solano, L., Cabrera, P., Ulehlova, E., & Espinoza, V. (2020). Exploring the use of educational technology in EFL teaching: A case study of primary education in the South Region of Ecuador. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 77-86. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1140683.pdf
Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Yang, J. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16(3), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2015.09.001
Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2017). Actively open-minded thinking: development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
Tabak, F., & Nguyen, N. T. (2013). Technology acceptance and performance in online learning environments: impact of self-regulation. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 116-132. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/tabak_0313.pdf
Taj, I. H., Ali, F., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2017). Effect of technology-enhanced language learning on EFL reading comprehension at tertiary level. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(1), 108-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.9
Vladova, G., Ullrich, A., Bender, B., & Gronau, N. (2021). Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the Covid-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study from Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 636086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086
Wang, J., Luo, R. (2022). Measuring students’ acceptance of using the Tencent conference application in EFL learning based on the technology acceptance model. In: Penalvo, et al. Resilience and Future of Smart Learning. ICSLE 2022. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_9
Wang, Y., Yu, L. & Yu, Z. (2022). An extended CCtalk technology acceptance model in EFL education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3),1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10909-9
Weng, F., Yang R-J., Ho, H-J., & Su, H-M. (2018). A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers. Applied System Innovation, 1(36), 1-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/asi1030036
Weyant, E. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edition. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1-2), 54-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231
Language Related Research