A Linguistic Study of Point of View in the Short Story "Frankness and Decisiveness" based on Simpson's model

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student of Linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This research aims at analyzing the narrator type and the modality governing his point of view in the short story "Frankness and Decisiveness" (1349) by Bahram Sadeghi". We have used Simpson's model (1993) in which narrative and point of view are studied utilizing a linguistic framework. The goal of this paper is to determine the type of narrator (first, second or third person) and modality of the story (positive, negative, neutral). We have assumed that the narrator is third person and modality is neutral. The data are analyzed according to categories and analytic instruments introduced by the theory; Therefore, the method of this research is descriptive-analytic. Modality in linguistics concerns the writer's view on the truth of a proposition stated in a sentence. Findings of this study show that the narrator is type B (third person) who willingly enters the characters' mind and reports their intentions and thoughts to the reader. Analyzing the modal devices in every sentence shows that the narrator uses verbs and adverbs of request, sentences stating opinions, generic sentences, imperative verbs and evaluative adjectives and adverbs all of which denote positive modality. To show the procedure which ends in a misunderstanding and also for evaluating the situation, the writer makes use of negative modality devices through which the most important elements are cognitive verbs.

Keywords


  • آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس و شیرین پور‌ابراهیم (1387). «بررسی زبان‌شناختی دیدگاه روایت‌گری داستان روز اول قبر صادق چوبک در چارچوب مدل سیمپسون». مجله نقد ادبی. س 1. ش 3. صص 7- 28.

  • اخوت، احمد (1374). دستور زبان داستان. اصفهان: نشر فردا.

  • افخمی، علی و سیده‌فاطمه علوی (1382). «زبان‌شناسی روایت». مجله دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران. س 53. ش 2 (پیاپی 165). صص 55-72.

  • ·      شعیری، حمیدرضا (1392). تجزیه و تحلیل نشانه- معناشناختی گفتمان. تهران: سمت.

  • ·      شیرازی عدل، مهرناز و فرهاد ساسانی(1392 ). «دیدگاه از منظر زبان‌شناسی شناختی و کاربرد آن در تحلیل متن داستانی». دو‌فصلنامه جستارهای زبانی. ش 1 (پیاپی 13). صص 65-87.

  • ریمون-کنان، شلومیت (1387). روایت داستانی: بوطیقای معاصر. ترجمه ابوالفضل حری. تهران: نیلوفر.

  • ·      صادقی، بهرام (1388).«صراحت و قاطعیت» (در مجموعة سنگر و قمقمه­های خالی). چ 2. تهران: کتاب زمان.

  • علوی، سیده‌فاطمه (1381). بررسی دیدگاه روایی در سه داستان کوتاه صادق چوبک: رویکرد تحلیل کلام انتقادی. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد. تهران: دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران.

  • وبستر، راجر (1382). پیش‌درآمدی بر مطالعه نظریه ادبی. ترجمه الهه دهنوی. چ 1. تهران: روزنگار.

  • لینت‌وِلت، ژپ (1390). رساله­ای در باب گونه‌شناسی روایت؛ نقطه دید. ترجمه علی عباسی و نصرت حجازی. چ 1. تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.

    • Barthes, R. (]1966[ 1977). “Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives”. trans. Heath, S. In Image Music Text. (pp. 79–124). New York: Hill & Wang.

    • Booth, W. (1961). The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Fowler, R. (1977). Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.

    • Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Freeman, D. (ed.) (1981). Essays in Modern Stylistics. London: Methuen.

    • Genette, G. ([1972] 1980). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. J. E. Lewin. Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Genette, G. ([1982] 1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. trans. C. Genette, G. and C. Doubinsky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    • Genette, G..([1983] 1988). Narrative Discourse Revisited. trans. J. E. Lewin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Genette, G. .([1991] 1993). Fiction and Diction. Trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Genette, G. (1966, 1982). “Frontiers of narrative”. In Figures of Literary Discourse. Trans. Sheridan, A. (pp. 127–42). New York: Columbia University Press.

    • James, H. (1963). “The art of fiction”. in M. Shapira (ed.) Henry James: Selected Literary Criticism. Harmondswarth: Penguin.

    • Lubbock, P. (1973). The Craft of Fiction [1921]. New York: Viking Press.

    • Okhovvat, A .(1995). The Grammar of Story, Esfahan: Farda Publication.

    • Scholes, R. & R. Kellogg (1966). The Nature of Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      • Shairi, H. R. & F. Sasani (2008). “ Point view and Perspective in Discourse”. International Journal of Humanities. Vol. 15. No .1.Pp. 69-80.



    • Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology, and Point of View. London: Routledge.

    • Tomashevskii, B. (1965).“Thematics”. in Lee T. Lemon & Marion J. Reis (eds). Russian Formalist Criticism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    • Uspensky, B. (1973). A Poetics of Composition. Berkeley: University of California Press.