• سلطانی، سیدعلی اصغر (1388). «تحلیل گفتمان به مثابه نظریه و روش». فصلنامۀ علوم سیاسی. ش 28. صص 153-180.


• قلقشندی (بی‌تا). صبح الأعشی فی صناعة الإنشاء. القاهرة: وزاره الثقافه و الارشاد القومی. المؤسسه المصریه العامه للتألیف والترجمه والطباعه والنشر.


• مازندرانى، محمدصالح بن احمد (1382 ق). شرح الکافی. تحقیق ابوالحسن شعرانی. تهران: المکتبه الأسلامیة.


• مجلسى، محمدباقر (1404 ق). مرآة العقول فی شرح أخبار آل الرسول. تحقیق هاشم رسولی محلاتی. ج ‏12. تهران: دارالکتب الإسلامیة.


• مقدسی‌نیا، مهدی و سلطانی سیدعلی‌اصغر (1393). «کاربردشناسی زبان و سازوکارهای ادب‌ورزی در برخی از ادعیۀ شیعه». جستارهای زبانی. د 5. ش 5 (پیاپی 21). بهمن و اسفند. صص 207-228.

• Beeman, W. O. (1986). Language, Status, and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.


• Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


• Brown, R. & A. Gilman (1980). “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity” In Laver, J. & S. Hutcheson (Ed.). Communication in Face to Face Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.


• Christys, A. (2010). “The Queen of the Franks Offers Gifts”In W. Davies & P. Fouracre (Ed.). The Languages of Gift in the Early Middle Ages (pp. 149-170).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


• Culpeper, J. & D. Z. Kádár (2010). Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang.


• Deuchar, M. (1989). “A pragmatic account of women's use of standard speech” In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.). Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex (pp. 27-32). London: Longman.


• Gaur, Albertine . (1994). A History of Calligraphy. MI Cross River Press.


• Green, G. (1996). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. N J Lawrence Erlbaum.


• Havilland, W. A. et. al. (2014) Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.


• Hollinger, A. (2005). “Politeness in Business Letters”. Synergy. Vol. 1(2). pp. 20–26.


• Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


• Kan, F. (2012). “Analysis of Politeness Strategy in Competitive Business English Letters”. In International Conference on Education Technology and Management Engineering(pp. 397-402). 1 June 2012. Nanjing. China. Vols. 16-17.


• Koessler, J. (2003). True Discipleship: The Art of Following Jesus. IL: Moody Publishers.


• Lakoff, R. (1973). “Language and Woman's place”. Language in Society. Vol. 2 (1). pp 45-80.


• Leech, G. (1996). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.


• Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.


• Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.


• Yaghoobi, M. (2009). “A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Selected Iranian and American Printed Media on the Representations of Hizbullah-Israel War”. In Journal of Intercultural Communication. No. 21. pp. 124-151.


• Yule, G. (1998). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

o    Gacek, A. (2009). Arabic Manuscripts: A Vademecum for Readers. MA: Brill.

o    Nickerson, C. (1999). “The Use of Politeness Strategies in Business Letters Written by Native Speakers of English”. In R. Geluykens & K. Pelsmaekers (Eds.). Discourse in Professional Contexts (pp. 127–142). Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

Partington, C. F. (1836). The British Cyclopedia of Literature, History, Geography, Law, and Politics. London: Orr & Smith.