1
Assistant Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2
Associate Professor of English, University Baqer, Qom, Iran
Abstract
Subh al-A'sha, written by Ahmad al-Qalqashandi 9 century (H.), elaborating official letter writing styles in Mamluk period is a valuable source for historical politeness studies. Based on Leech's politeness maxims and Beeman's approach to politeness, this paper tries to unravel the politeness strategies in official letters of the Mamluks, which depend heavily on power relations. The results show that strategies adopted in these letters are in line with Beeman's "self-lowering" and "other-raising" elements. They also confirm Leech's maxim 3 and 4, out of his six maxims, whereby individuals do their best to praise the other party during the communication. Thus, strategies applied in these letters include "exclusion," "raising the addressee," and "praising the addressee." Using a religious discourse, whose lack would be offensive, is another feature of Mamluk official letters. Finally, social discourse was also adopted in these letters through which the writer acquired his dependent / independent identity.
سلطانی، سیدعلی اصغر (1388). «تحلیل گفتمان به مثابه نظریه و روش». فصلنامۀ علوم سیاسی. ش 28. صص 153-180.
قلقشندی (بی‌تا). صبح الأعشی فی صناعة الإنشاء. القاهرة: وزاره الثقافه و الارشاد القومی. المؤسسه المصریه العامه للتألیف والترجمه والطباعه والنشر.
مازندرانى، محمدصالح بن احمد (1382 ق). شرح الکافی. تحقیق ابوالحسن شعرانی. تهران: المکتبه الأسلامیة.
مجلسى، محمدباقر (1404 ق). مرآة العقول فی شرح أخبار آل الرسول. تحقیق هاشم رسولی محلاتی. ج 12. تهران: دارالکتب الإسلامیة.
مقدسی‌نیا، مهدی و سلطانی سیدعلی‌اصغر (1393). «کاربردشناسی زبان و سازوکارهای ادب‌ورزی در برخی از ادعیۀ شیعه». جستارهای زبانی. د 5. ش 5 (پیاپی 21). بهمن و اسفند. صص 207-228.
Beeman, W. O. (1986). Language, Status, and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in LanguageUsage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R. & A. Gilman (1980). “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity” In Laver, J. & S. Hutcheson (Ed.). Communication in Face to Face Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Christys, A. (2010). “The Queen of the Franks Offers Gifts”In W. Davies & P. Fouracre (Ed.). The Languages of Gift in the Early Middle Ages (pp. 149-170).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. & D. Z. Kádár (2010). Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang.
Deuchar, M. (1989). “A pragmatic account of women's use of standard speech” In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.). Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex (pp. 27-32). London: Longman.
Gaur, Albertine . (1994). A History of Calligraphy. MI Cross River Press.
Green, G. (1996). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. N J Lawrence Erlbaum.
Havilland, W. A. et. al. (2014) Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Hollinger, A. (2005). “Politeness in Business Letters”. Synergy. Vol. 1(2). pp. 20–26.
Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kan, F. (2012). “Analysis of Politeness Strategy in Competitive Business English Letters”. In International Conference on Education Technology and Management Engineering(pp. 397-402). 1 June 2012. Nanjing. China. Vols. 16-17.
Koessler, J. (2003). True Discipleship: The Art of Following Jesus. IL: Moody Publishers.
Lakoff, R. (1973). “Language and Woman's place”. Language in Society. Vol. 2 (1). pp 45-80.
Leech, G. (1996). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
Yaghoobi, M. (2009). “A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Selected Iranian and American Printed Media on the Representations of Hizbullah-Israel War”. In Journal of Intercultural Communication. No. 21. pp. 124-151.
Yule, G. (1998). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
o Gacek, A. (2009). Arabic Manuscripts: A Vademecum for Readers. MA: Brill.
o Nickerson, C. (1999). “The Use of Politeness Strategies in Business Letters Written by Native Speakers of English”. In R. Geluykens & K. Pelsmaekers (Eds.). Discourse in Professional Contexts (pp. 127–142). Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Partington, C. F. (1836). The British Cyclopedia of Literature, History, Geography, Law, and Politics. London: Orr & Smith.
Moghaddasi-nia,M. and Sultani,A. A. (2016). Politeness Strategies in Mamluk Official Letters: The Case Study of Subh al-A'sha. Language Related Research, 7(5), 171-192.
MLA
Moghaddasi-nia,M. , and Sultani,A. A. . "Politeness Strategies in Mamluk Official Letters: The Case Study of Subh al-A'sha", Language Related Research, 7, 5, 2016, 171-192.
HARVARD
Moghaddasi-nia,M.,Sultani,A. A. (2016). 'Politeness Strategies in Mamluk Official Letters: The Case Study of Subh al-A'sha', Language Related Research, 7(5), pp. 171-192.
CHICAGO
M. Moghaddasi-nia and A. A. Sultani, "Politeness Strategies in Mamluk Official Letters: The Case Study of Subh al-A'sha," Language Related Research, 7 5 (2016): 171-192,
VANCOUVER
Moghaddasi-nia,M.,Sultani,A. A. Politeness Strategies in Mamluk Official Letters: The Case Study of Subh al-A'sha. Language Related Research, 2016; 7(5): 171-192.
Language Related Research