The Study of Gender Role in Providing Details in Story based on the Functional Grammar

Author
Abstract
The present study is an attempt to determine the frequency and the role of circumstantial elements with a comparative approach between writers in both sex within the framework of Systemic Functional Grammar. In this research, data include two stories called ʻBroken Marbleʼ, written by Simin Daneshvar (2001) and ʻThe Same as it wasʼ written by Jafar Modarres Sadegi (2006)which have been analyzed according to the concepts discussed in ʻIdeational Meta functionʼ and ʻTransitivity Systemʼ. As giving details in Functional Grammar is represented in the form of circumstantial elements in the text, at the first step, all the circumstantial elements in the stories were found and then according the Functional Grammar and linguistic context were categorized. Analyzing the data showed less circumstantial elements in Daneshvar's story than Modarres Sadegi's; but the former was more versatile in using various kinds of circumstantial elements in her work. In both stories, ʻ placeʼ adjuncts have allocated the highest amount of circumstantial elements to itself. In the work of man writer, there is no guise and sourceʼ adjuncts , while woman writer has used these kinds of adjuncts. She has used all of them in the form of quotation (citation), so that, when she narrates the story from the mouth of the main character, remembers others' utterances in each situation. Also, in the story of woman, it can be seen that there are the situations which represent feelings, and she has transferred these feelings by using different kinds of adjuncts. It seems that review of literary texts from this perspective reveals new aspects of these works in fiction, literary criticism and stylistics. Introducing this category and applying it in stylistics of stories, is another objective of the present article.

Keywords


  • تولان، مایکل (1386). روایت‌شناسی: درآمدی زبان‌شناختی- انتقادی. ترجمه فاطمه علوی و فاطمه نعمتی. تهران: سمت.

  • جعفری، آزیتا (‌1388). «بررسی افزوده‌ها در زبان فارسی: براساس رویکردهای نقشی و صوری». مجله دستور. ش 5. صص 128- 155.

  • دانشور، سیمین (‌1380). به کی سلام کنم؟. تهران: خوارزمی.

  • رضویان، حسین و معصومه عزیزی (1393). «نگاهی نو به ارائه جزئیات در قرآن کریم بر‌اساس زبان‌شناسی نقش‌گرا». فصلنامه پژوهش‌های ادبی‌- قرآنی. د 2. ش 3. صص 53- 73‌.

  • صبحی قراملکی، ناصر (‌1386). روان‌شناسی تفاوت‌های فردی. تهران: دانشگاه جامع علمی- کاربردی.

  • عمران‌پور، محمدرضا (‌1386). «کارکرد هنری قید و گروه‌های قیدی در اشعار شاملو». مجله پژوهش‌های ادبی. ش 18. صص 78- 102.

  • فاولر، راجر (‌1381). بررسی ادبیات به‌منزله زبان، در زبان‌شناسی و نقد ادبی. ترجمه مریم خوزان و حسین پاینده. تهران: نشرنی.

  • لسانی، حسین (1384). «مقایسة‌ نقش‌های اسم در زبان‌های فارسی و روسی». مجله پژوهش زبان‌های خارجی. ش 24. صص 1- 8.

  • مجدفر، مرتضی و دیگران (‌1389). 222 نکته برای پدران و مادران: راهنمایی برای یادگیری اثربخش؛ آموزش و آزمون‌های فرزندان . تهران: امرود.

  • مدرس صادقی، جعفر (‌1385). قسمت دیگران. تهران: مرکز.

  • میرصادقی، جمال (‌1388). عناصر داستان. تهران: مؤسسه نشر سخن.



  • Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd edition. New York: Continuum international Publishing Group .pp. 206-337.

  • Ernst, T. (2002). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic books.

  • Halliday, M. A. K & Ch. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3 rdedition. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. pp. 259-279.

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (2005). Studies in English Language. Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. Vol. 7. Edited by Jonathan. London: Continuum.

  • Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax: exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simpson, P. )2004(. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.