1
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Linguistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2
Associate Professor of Linguistics Department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
It seems that speech technology is a multidimensional skill which is related to some semiotic verbal and non-verbal issues and is more complicated than the usual and everyday language that native speakers use to communicate. Studies have shown that the power of speech is not any less than magic indeed in many fields.
In this paper, it has been tried to investigate the quality of both speech and speech techniques of 10 Farsi speakers in the viewpoint of 100 Farsi native speakers including 21 verbal, Para-linguistic, non-linguistic, and pro-enunciation factors applying a listener-based method which was done for the first time in Farsi. The Participants have been chosen through stratified sampling to obtain data. The opinion poll has been about the speech quality of the ten Farsi speakers who were speaking spontaneously on TV live programs of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasts (IRIB). Hence, 20000 data were gathered from the statistical population. Then, descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated to reveal the most effective factors on speech quality.
Selecting the factors were inspired by principles and theories of Grice (1975), Yule and Brown (1989), Edlund and Gustafson (2010) in the framework of Eco Semiotics (1979). Hence, 21000 data were gathered from the statistical population. Then, descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. At first, in order to find out the questionnaire reliability, some of the respondents (40 people) were asked to complete the questionnaires again after ten days by watching all the ten one-minute recorded films of speeches through the same process. Consequently, after calculating the data and comparing with the previous questionnaires’ results, the reliability of the questionnaire was determined based on intra class coefficient (ICC) procedure. According to the definition of reliability coefficient (Mooner, 2000), the ICC degree for the overall questionnaires was 0.88 that indicates high correlation between both tests with a ten-day time interval. The internal validity of 0.872 was estimated as well.
Subsequently, among all the observed factors, relatively, para-linguistic and non-linguistic factors have been identified as more effective than linguistic and pro-enunciation factors on speech quality of Farsi speaking skills. As a result, by presenting and identifying the degree and the percentage of the related factors, effective improvement and reinforcement strategies on speech techniques quality for Farsi speakers can be specified and clarified.
· امانی، محمود (1394). تکنیکهای سخنوری. همدان: مؤسسه سخنوری تیسفون.
· تریسی، برایان (1388). حرف بزن تا برنده شوی. ترجمه پروین آقایی. قم: اشکذر.
ثروتیان، بهروز (1383). فن بیان در آفرینش خیال. تهران: امیرکبیر.
حکیمی، محمدرضا (1384). ادبیات و تعهد در اسلام. تهران: دلیل ما.
· دانشور، داود. (1389). صدا و بیان برای بازیگر. تهران: سمت.
· شعیری، حمیدرضا (1388). «پادگفتمان ادبی؛ رویکرد نشانهمعناشناختی». نشست تخصصی ماهانه مرکز تحقیقات زبان و ادبیات فارسی.
· صفوی، کورش (1387). درآمدی بر معنیشناسی. تهران: سوره مهر و پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی.
گادامر، هانس گئورگ (1381). «آموزه قرن». ترجمه محمود عبادیان. هنر و معماری: زیباشناخت موسسه فرهنگی- هنری هنر معماری قرن. ش 7. صص 209-218.
محمودیبختیاری، بهروز و مهسا معنوی (1395). «خشونت کلامی در نمایشنامه هاملت و سالاد فصل: رویکرد گفتمانی». جستارهای زبانی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. د 7، ش 2 (پیاپی 30)، خرداد و تیر، صص 187-205.
معصومیان، فرزانه سادات (1392). «شش کار که هنگام حرف زدن نباید انجام دهیم». http://www.fanebayan.ir/
مطهری، مرتضی (1391). خطابه و منبر. ج 1. تهران: صدرا.
· ویسیحصار، رحمان و منوچهر توانگر (1393). «استعاره و فرهنگ: رویکردی شناختی به دو ترجمه رباعیات خیام». جستارهای زبانی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. د 5. ش 4 (پیاپی 20). صص 197-218.
· Amani, M. (2015). Eloquence Techniques. Tehran: Tisfoon [In Persian].
· Daneshvar, D. (2010). Voice and Speech of Actors. Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
Eco, U. (1979). A Theory of Semiotics. USA: Indiana University Press.
Eco, U. (1994). “Semantics, Pragmatics, and Text Semiotics”. In: The Limits of Interpretation: Advances in Semiotics, USA: Indiana University Press.
Eco, Umberto (1979). A Theory of Semiotics. USA: Indiana University Press.
Eco, Umberto (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. USA: Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Edlund, J. & J. Gustafson (2010). Ask the Experts Part II: Analysis. In eds. Linguistic Theory and Raw Sound by Henrichsen, P. J.: Copenhagen Business School.
Edlund, J.; J. Beskow; K. Elenius; K. Hellmer; S. Strombergson & D. House (2010). Spontal: A swedish Spontanous dialoge Corpus of Audio-Video and Motion Capture. Valetta, Malta.
Karimi,L. , Golfam,A. , Golfam,A. and Ameri,H. (2017). Speech Technology and Effective Semiotic Factors on Its Quality: A Listener-Based Analysis. Language Related Research, 8(4), 71-95.
MLA
Karimi,L. , Golfam,A. , Golfam,A. , and Ameri,H. . "Speech Technology and Effective Semiotic Factors on Its Quality: A Listener-Based Analysis", Language Related Research, 8, 4, 2017, 71-95.
HARVARD
Karimi,L.,Golfam,A.,Golfam,A.,Ameri,H. (2017). 'Speech Technology and Effective Semiotic Factors on Its Quality: A Listener-Based Analysis', Language Related Research, 8(4), pp. 71-95.
CHICAGO
L. Karimi, A. Golfam, A. Golfam and H. Ameri, "Speech Technology and Effective Semiotic Factors on Its Quality: A Listener-Based Analysis," Language Related Research, 8 4 (2017): 71-95,
VANCOUVER
Karimi,L.,Golfam,A.,Golfam,A.,Ameri,H. Speech Technology and Effective Semiotic Factors on Its Quality: A Listener-Based Analysis. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(4): 71-95.