Department of French, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Teaching/learning French nasal vowels are one of the problems encountered by Iranian teachers and students in institutes and universities. The problems arise due to the fact that there are no approximate phonetic analogues for those vowels in Persian. In the present study, the acoustic phonetics is used. It is a method based on acoustic analysis using speech analysis and phonetics software. In recent years, voice analysis software’s have made it possible to identify phonetic errors with precision. The research objective is to identify French nasal vowels errors by Iranian students and analyze inter-phoneme-phonetic data. The population under study consists 8 students of the French language at University of Isfahan during the first semester 2015-16. Student’s oral productions have been analyzed by using analysis software with regard to structural physical parameters of F1, F2 and F3. As the results of the present study demonstrate, students in the production of French nasal vowels (CVn) are in trouble due to the absence of such vowels in the native language. The process of “unpacking nasal vowels” and “nasalizing the oral vowels” are evident due to the impact of native language. Therefore, the frequency of phonetic errors, French nasal vowels, has a meaningful relationship with the French nasal vowels characteristics and phonetic structure of the students’ native language.
بیجنخان، محمود (1392). نظام آوایی زبان فارسی. تهران: سمت.
رحمتیان، روحالله و هاله چراغی (1389). «مشکلات تلفظ زبان فرانسه نزد زبانآموزان ایرانی». رشد زبان. ش 94. صص 62-52.
علیمردانی، نجمه و بتول علینژاد (1392). «بررسی تلفظ واکه شوا توسط فارسیزبانان: کاربرد آواشناسی آکوستیکی برای اهداف آموزشی». زبان و زبانشناسی. دورۀ 9. ش 18. صص 113-128.
علینژاد، بتول و فهیمه حسینیبالام (1391). مبانی آواشناسی آکوستیکی. اصفهان: دانشگاه اصفهان.
محمدی، هیوا و دیگران (1390). « تعیین ساختار سازهای و فضای واکهای در واکههای زبان فارسی». شنوایی شناسی. دورۀ 20. ش 2. صص 79-85.
Carignan, C. (2012). “Quand nasal est plus que nasal: L’articulation orale des voyelles nasales en français”. Actes de la Conférence Conjointe JEP-TALN-RECITAL. Vol. 1. JEP. Pp. 747–754.
Carton, F. (1997). Introduction à la Phonétique du Français. Paris : Dunod.
Champagne-Muzar, C. and J. Bourdages (1998). Le Point sur la Phonétique. Paris: CLE international.
Conseil de l’Europe (2005). Cadre Européen Commun de Référence pour les Langues. Division des politiques linguistiques Strasbourg. Editions Didier.
Delvaux V. (2003). Contrôle et Connaissance phonétique : Les Voyelles Nasales du Français. Thèse de Doctorat. Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Delvaux V. (2009). “ Perception du contraste de nasalité vocalique en français”. Journal of French Language Studies. No. IXX. Pp. 25-59.
Delvaux V. et al. (2002). “Propriétés acoustiques et articulatoires desvoyelles nasales du français”. XXIVèmes Journées D’étude sur la Parole. Nancy. No. I. Pp. 348-351.
Detey, S. et al.(2010-b). “Evaluation des voyelles nasales en français L2 en production: De la nécessité d’un corpus multitâches”. 2ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. eds. F. Neveu et al. Actes de CMLF’10. Paris : ILF. Pp. 1289-1301.
Landercy, A. and R. Renard (1977). Éléments de Phonétique. Bruxelles : Didier.
Malmberg, B. (1982). Phonétique Française. Lund : LiberFörlag.
Meunier, C. (2007). "Phonétique acoustique: Phonétique acoustique". Auzou P. Les dysarthries. Solal. pp.164-173.Disponible sur https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00250272. (acc : 1395/07/15).
Ball, M.-J. and E. G. Fiona (2013). Handbook of Vowels and Vowel Disorders. London: Taylorand Francis.
Boersma, P. and D. Weenink (2016). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (version 6.0). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Clements, G.N. et al. (2015). “The feature [nasal]”. Rialland A. et al. Features in Phonology and Phonetics: Posthumous Writings by Nick Clements and Coauthors (Pp.195-21). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Delattre, P. and M. Monnot (1968). “The Role of Duration in the Identification of French Nasal Vowels” International Review of Applied Linguistics. No. VI. Pp. 267-288.
Detey, S. et al. (2010-a). “Assessing non-native speakers’ production of French nasal vowels: a multitask corpus-based study”. eds. M. Minegishi et al. Working Papers in Corpus-based Linguistics and Language Education 5, Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Pp. 277-293.
Lapkin, S. (1985). “Some procedures for testing French speaking skills in immersion classrooms". Les Nouvelles de l'ACPI. vol. 8. No 3. Pp. 10-14.
Petersen, S. (2015). “Categorical nasal vowel acquisition in L2 French learners”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository. upenn.edu/pwpl/vol21/iss1/25. (acc : 1395/07/15)
Rees, D. A. (2008). Towards Proto-Persian: An optimality theoretic historical reconstruction. Doctoral thesis. Washington, DC.
otroshi,M. and otroshi,M. (2017). The Use of Acoustic Phonetics in Identifying Phonetic Errors: French Nasal Vowels. Language Related Research, 8(3), 187-216.
MLA
otroshi,M. , and otroshi,M. . "The Use of Acoustic Phonetics in Identifying Phonetic Errors: French Nasal Vowels", Language Related Research, 8, 3, 2017, 187-216.
HARVARD
otroshi,M.,otroshi,M. (2017). 'The Use of Acoustic Phonetics in Identifying Phonetic Errors: French Nasal Vowels', Language Related Research, 8(3), pp. 187-216.
CHICAGO
M. otroshi and M. otroshi, "The Use of Acoustic Phonetics in Identifying Phonetic Errors: French Nasal Vowels," Language Related Research, 8 3 (2017): 187-216,
VANCOUVER
otroshi,M.,otroshi,M. The Use of Acoustic Phonetics in Identifying Phonetic Errors: French Nasal Vowels. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(3): 187-216.