1
Assistant professor, department of general linguistics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2
3. Ph.D. student, department of general linguistics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
Van Leeuwen's socio- semiotic network of social actors (2008), is a framework in Critical Discourse Analysis which helps discourse analysts discover how the social features ,settled in the underlying levels of discourses, are represented on the upper levels. This study tries to explore the way social actors are nominated and categorized in “Al” which is a story about the culture of nomadic people in Iran by Mohammad Bahmanbeigi, a famous Iranian novelist and the winner of the UNESCO’s literacy prize. By social actors we mean every single person that plays a role or occupies a specific position in a given society. Particularly, this study attempts to find answers to the following questions: 1. How does the writer use nomination and categorization to express his own viewpoints about the social actors of Nomadic societies of Iran? 2. Can these nominations and categorizations reflect the nomadic people's viewpoints about social actors at the time of nomadic people's illiteracy? Adopting Van Leeuwen's model of representing social actors, a lot of researcher have tried to explore the social actors of different political and educational discourses but the innovation of this study is that it tries to change the direction of studies from political discourses to literary ones. Another point is that most of the studies about the representation of social actors have relied mostly on the frequency of the socio- semantic features for their final discussion and results but this study has focused more on qualitative analysis than just counting the frequency of the socio- semiotic features. Although counting frequencies can reveal significant patterns, it is better not to make great claims for numbers. On the contrary, it is important to realize that frequencies often shift with the stages in the writer’s argument and may not be an overall characteristic of the text (vide. Van Leeuwen, 2008: 31). The results of this study show that the representation of social actors in “Al” is purposeful and serves to control the viewpoints of the society. The writer, using the advantages of nomination and categorization, expresses his viewpoints covertly and portrays the oppression of women in nomadic societies. On the one hand, the writer categorizes women generically to demonstrate them as the social actors engaged in common complications and on the other hand, he nominates women specifically and individually to picture them as distinguished and independent persons. Men's appraisements are all positive and represent the nomadic people's opinions about males but the appraisements of women, according to the social norms dominating the text, are changing. Using the advantages of deviation, the writer introduces the main character of the story as a deviant actor involved in opposite activities to challenge social norms and beliefs.
آقاگلزاده، فردوس و دیگران (1392). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی شیوۀ بازنمایی کنشگران ایرانی و غربی در پروندۀ هستهای ایران در رسانههای بینالمللی (الگوی 2008 ون لیوون)». جستارهای زبانی. ش 1. صص 1-19.
بهمنبیگی، محمد (1386). به اجاقت قسم (خاطرات آموزشی). شیراز: نوید شیراز.
بهمنبیگی، محمد (1388). بخارای من، ایل من. شیراز: نوید شیراز.
پوشنه، آتنا و مرتضی بابک معین (1392). «تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی در اثری از ابراهیم گلستان با استفاده از مؤلفههای معنایی- شناختی گفتمانمدار با توجه به بازنمایی کنشگران اجتماعی». جستارهای زبانی. ش 14. صص 1-26.
· حقپرست، لیلا (1391). «شیوههای تصویرسازی کنشگران اجتماعی در داستان بهمن از شاهنامه و بهمننامه (بر اساس مؤلفههای جامعهشناختی- معنایی در تحلیل گفتمان)». جستارهای زبانی. ش 10. صص 45-62.
یارمحمدی، لطفالله (1383). گفتمانشناسی رایج و انتقادی. تهران: هرمس.
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2007). “Critical discourse analysis and literature”. Adab Pazhuhi, (4). Pp. 17-27. [In Persian].
Aghagolzadeh, F.; R. Keirabadi & A. Golfam (2013), “The comparative study of linguistic representation of Iranian and western actors of Iran's nuclear program in International Media (Van Leeuwen's Model 2008)”. Language Related Research. (1). Pp. 1-19. [In Persian].
Bahmanbeigi, M. (2007). Be Ojaghet Ghasam. Shiraz: Navid Shiraz [In Persian].
Bahmanbeigi, M. (2009). Bokharaye Man, Eile Man. Shiraz: Navid Shiraz [In Persian].
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. & M. Coulthard (1996), Text and Practices: Readingsin Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Haghparast, L. (2012). “The representation of social actors in the story of Bahman from Shahnameh and Bahmannameh (Based on semiotic features in critical discourse analysis). Language Related Research. (10). Pp. 45-62. [In Persian].
Hodge, R. & G. Kress (1996). Language and Ideology. London: Routledge.
Kabgani, S. (2013). “The representation of muslim women in non-islamic media: a critical discourse analysis study on Guardian". International Journalof Women’s Research. Vol.II. No. 1. Pp. 57 – 78.
Karimaghaei, Z. & M. Bagherzadeh Kasmani (2013), “The representation of social actors in Top Notch 2a and 2b”. Asian Journal of Social Sciences &Humanities. Vol. II. No. 1. Pp. 27-38.
Lotfipour Saedi, K. (1992). Discourse Analysis, Iranian Journal of Linguistics, (1). Pp. 9-40. [In Persian].
Poushaneh, A & M. Babak Moein (2013). “The Representation of social actors through semiotic features in One Story by Ebrahim Golestan: A CDA Study”. Language Related Research. (14). Pp. 1-26. [In Persian].
Sahragard, R. & G. Davatgarzadeh (2010), “The representation of social actors in interchange third edition series: A critical discourse analysis”. The Journalof Teaching Language Skills (JTLS). Vol. II. No. 1. Pp. 67-89.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). “Discourse, power and accents”. In coldas- coulthard, CR & M. Coulthard. (Eds). Text and Practices: Readings in CDA. London: Routledge.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice, New Tools for CriticalDiscourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2004). Current and Critical Discourse Studies. Tehran: Hermes [In Persian].
Gholamalizadeh,K. , Tafakkori Rezaei,S. and Akbari,H. (2017). The Nomination and Categorization of Social Actors in âAlâ, According To Van Leewenâs Frame work. Language Related Research, 8(7), 71-89.
MLA
Gholamalizadeh,K. , Tafakkori Rezaei,S. , and Akbari,H. . "The Nomination and Categorization of Social Actors in âAlâ, According To Van Leewenâs Frame work", Language Related Research, 8, 7, 2017, 71-89.
HARVARD
Gholamalizadeh,K.,Tafakkori Rezaei,S.,Akbari,H. (2017). 'The Nomination and Categorization of Social Actors in âAlâ, According To Van Leewenâs Frame work', Language Related Research, 8(7), pp. 71-89.
CHICAGO
K. Gholamalizadeh, S. Tafakkori Rezaei and H. Akbari, "The Nomination and Categorization of Social Actors in âAlâ, According To Van Leewenâs Frame work," Language Related Research, 8 7 (2017): 71-89,
VANCOUVER
Gholamalizadeh,K.,Tafakkori Rezaei,S.,Akbari,H. The Nomination and Categorization of Social Actors in âAlâ, According To Van Leewenâs Frame work. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(7): 71-89.