1
PhD , general linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2
PhD student, general linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3
PhD in general linguistics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
According to Talmy (2000), the basic motion event consists of one object (the ‘Figure’) moving or located with respect to another object (the reference-object or ‘Ground’). Moreover, its semantic structure has another two internal components, i.e. ‘Path’ and ‘Motion’. The ‘Path’ is the track followed or the location occupied by the Figure object with respect to the Ground object, and the ‘Motion’ refers to the presence in the event of motion or location. The present research focuses on the transitivity of motion verbs in Persian language. In order to seek the notion, research data have been analyzed based on Talmy's theoretical framework (2000), and the components of motion in these verbs have been investigated. The research method is descriptive-analytic. Consequently, seeking the notion of transitivity in motion verbs, the research includes 219 Modern Persian verbs from two sites (Persian Linguistic Database (PLDB) and Hamshahri Online news website). Among those mentioned motion verbs, 126 cases were intransitive and 63 were transitive. Based on the main goal of the research, the question was raised; “what is the difference between the figure and the ground in transitive and intransitive verbs?” it is necessary to mention, the criterion for determining the transition is following the pattern of "NP1, transitive verb, NP2". Persian language express a Motion event using the transitive construction in which the subject denotes the Figure (the moving entity) and the object denotes the Ground (the reference object). In Persian language, in most cases, verbs can express a motion event in the Intransitive Construction. . In Persian, the object usually depicts the referral point or path based on the semantic features of the verb. In cases of causative verbs, the object is the same as the figure that makes the displacement. In addition, in the intransitive structures, the subject is the figure and intransitive verbs demonstrate a change or a new position. In these examples, the path is often shown through a prepositional phrase.
پشتوان، حمیده؛ حقبین، فریده و آزیتا افراشی (1394). «بازنمود رویدادهای حرکتی در گفتار روایی کودکان فارسیزبان در نگرش شناختی». جستارهای زبانی. ش 3 (پیاپی24). صص 19-40.
حامدی شیروان، زهرا و شریفی، شهلا (1393). «بررسی ردهشناختی مقوله قمر در ساخت رویدادی افعال حرکتی در زبان فارسی». جستارهای زبانی. ش 2 (پیاپی 18).صص 71- 88.
مسگرخویی، مریم (1392). «بازنمود مسیر در افعال حرکتی فارسی». دستور. ج 9. صص 74-92.
Aurnague, M. (1996). “Les noms de localisation interne, tentative de caractérisation sémantique à partir de données du basque et du français”. Cahier de Lexicologie 69 (2): pp. 159-192.
Aurnague, M. (1996). “The names of internal localization, attempt of semantic characterization from Basque and French data”. Workbook of Lexicology 69 (2). Pp. 159-192. [In French].
Aurnague, M. (1998). “Basque genitives and part-whole relations: Typical configurations and dependences”. Carnets de Grammaire 1. Pp. 1-50.
Aurnague, M. (2011). “How motion verbs are spatial:The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French”. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources. Vol. 34:1. Pp. 1–34.
Berman, R. & D. I. Slobin (1994), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Choi-Jonin, I. & L. Sarda (2002),“ Transitive Motion Verbs in French and in Korean”. www.lattice.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/CHOI-SARDALouvain2002.pdf
Cifuentes Férez, P. (2008). Motion in English And Spanish: A Perspective from Cognitive Linguistics, Typology and Psycholinguistics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University de Murcia.
Dowty, D. (1991). “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection”. Language. 67 (3).Pp 547-619.
Evans, V. & M. Green )2006), Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction. Vol. I Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
Hamedi Shirvan, Z. & Sh. Sharifi (2014), “A typological analysis of satellite in the event structure of motion verbs in Persian”. Language Related Research. Vol. 5, No.2 (Tome 18). Pp. 71-88. [In Persian].
Langacker, R. (2011). Grammaticalization and Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mesgar-Khoei, M. (2014). “The representation of path In Persian motion verbs”. Grammar; the Academy of Persian Language and Literature. Vol. 9. Pp. 74-92. [In Persian].
Nass, A. (2007). Prototypical Transitivity. Amesterdam: John Benjamin Publishers.
Poshtvan H.; F. Haghbin & A. Afrashi (2015), “Representation of motion events In Persian-speaking children's narratives; a cognitive approach”. Language Related Research. Vol. 6, No.3 (Tome 24). Pp.19-40. [In Persian].
Sarda, L. (2000). “Semantics of French direct transitive motion verbs” In Cognition in Language Use, Selected Papers from the Seventh International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 1, Eniko Németh T. (ed). Antwerp, Belgium: International Pragmatics Associatio. Pp. 388-404. .
Slobin, D. I. (2003). “Language and thought online”. Cognitive Consequences of Language in Mind Advances in the Investigation of language and thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Pp 157-191.
Talmy, L. (1985).“ Lexicalization patterns: semantics structure in lexical forms”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description,3. Pp. 57-149.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. 2 Vols. Cambridge, Mass. MIT-Press.
Taylor, J. (1995). Linguistic Categorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
najafian,A. , shahhoseini,F. , rovshan,B. , Saboori,N. , rovshan,B. and najafian,A. (2017). Transitivity of Motion Verbs in Persian Language. Language Related Research, 8(7), 117-136.
MLA
najafian,A. , shahhoseini,F. , rovshan,B. , Saboori,N. , rovshan,B. , and najafian,A. . "Transitivity of Motion Verbs in Persian Language", Language Related Research, 8, 7, 2017, 117-136.
HARVARD
najafian,A.,shahhoseini,F.,rovshan,B.,Saboori,N.,rovshan,B.,najafian,A. (2017). 'Transitivity of Motion Verbs in Persian Language', Language Related Research, 8(7), pp. 117-136.
CHICAGO
A. najafian, F. shahhoseini, B. rovshan, N. Saboori, B. rovshan and A. najafian, "Transitivity of Motion Verbs in Persian Language," Language Related Research, 8 7 (2017): 117-136,
VANCOUVER
najafian,A.,shahhoseini,F.,rovshan,B.,Saboori,N.,rovshan,B.,najafian,A. Transitivity of Motion Verbs in Persian Language. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(7): 117-136.