Investigation of Tense and Grammatical Agreement in the Speech of Persian Agrammatic Aphasics According to the Tree Pruning Hypothesis

Authors
1 Islamic Azad University, Ahwaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Ahwaz Islamic Azad University
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Payame Noor University, I. R.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Ahwaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center
Abstract
Across most languages, verbs produced by agrammatic aphasics are frequently marked by syntactically and semantically inappropriate inflectional affixes. The present study focuses on tense and grammatical agreement in the speech of Persian agrammatic aphasics according to the Tree Pruning Hypothesis (Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997). We wanted to know whether or not all functional morphemes are equally affected in this syndrome. We hypothesized that tense features are more severely impaired than agreement inflection. So we evaluated two Persian agrammatic patients in this descriptive-analytic study. They were classified as agrammatic Broca's aphasics according to the Persian aphasia test. The spontaneous speech, verb completion task and sentence repetition task were also designed and performed. Our findings showed that tense features are more severely impaired than agreement inflection. Results did not indicate a significant difference between different aspects of the Past tense; there was a significant difference between the mean of responses to Past tense in comparison to Present tense and Future. Our findings showed that the impairment in use of Past tense was more than the other tenses. On the other hand, tense features were more severely impaired than agreement inflection. This is because in languages with a rich system of agreement inflections like Persian, the verb agreement is a phonological representation of agreement between subject and verbal head in a specific position called Inflection phrase. Subject-verb agreement errors may occur because there is no movement of verb from the head of the tense phrase to the head of the agreement phrase as a kind of head-to head movement. The general idea is that the selective pattern of impairment in Broca's agrammatic aphasia and the dissociations witnessed in tense and agreement use follows from the inaccessibility of high nodes of the syntactic tree to agrammatic speakers. This causes syntactic structures that relate to high nodes of the tree to be impaired in agrammatism, whereas lower structures are unimpaired. A retrospective examination of the literature shows that our findings are corroborated by others. These findings also bear upon central issues in linguistic theories, such as checking theory in Minimalist Program by Noam Chomsky (1992) and that of Pollock (1989), regarding split inflection.

Keywords

Subjects


• Alizadeh, A. & A. Zendeh-Del, (2014), “Tense and agreement in Persian agrammatic Broca's Aphasia”. 12th Iranin Speech Therapy Congress. Pp. 25-27 [In Persian].
• Bastiaanse, R. et al. (2011). “Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study”. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24. Pp. 652–673.
• Chomsky, N. (1992). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. MIT Occasional papers in linguistics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
• Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2004). Theoretical Linguistics: Emergence and Development of Generative Grammar. 2nd Edition). Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
• De Bleser, R. & C. Luzzatti, (1994), “Morphological processing in Italian agrammatic speakers: Syntactic implementation of inflectional morphology”. Brain and Language, 46 (1). Pp. 21-40.
• De Roo, E. (1995). “Articles and finite verb inflections in Dutch agrammatism”. Poster presented at the RuG-SAN-VKL conference on aphasiology, Groningen, Netherlands.
• Faroqi-Shah, Y. & L. Friedman, (2015), “Production of verb tense in agrammatic aphasia: A meta-analysis and further data". Behavioural Neurology.Pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1155/2015/983870
• Friedmann, N. & Y. Grodzinsky ,(2000). “Split inflection in neurolinguistics”. Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics.Pp. 84-104.
• Friedmann, N. (1997). “Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: pruning the syntactic tree”. Brain and Language, 80.Pp. 397–425.
• Friedmann, N. (2002). “Question production in agrammatism: the tree pruning hypothesis”. Brain and Language, No. 80.Pp. 160-187.
• Friedmann, N. (2005). “Degrees of severity and recovery in agrammatism: climbing up the syntactic tree”. Aphasilology, 19 (10/11).Pp. 1037-1051.
• Fyndanis et. al. (2015). Production of subject-verb agreement, tense, mood, and negation in Italian agrammatic aphasia, pp. 1-4. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283196008
• Gavarro, A. (2002). “Failure to agree in agrammatism, Clinical Linguistics”. Theory and Applications in Speech Pathology and Therapy.Pp. 267-278
• Hagiwara, H. (1995). “The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation”. Brain and Language, 50. Pp. 92–116.
• Maleki Moghaddam, A. et al. (2017). “Analyzing the inflectional structure of Persian verb based on Word and Paradigm Theory”. IQBQ.; 8(2): 277-307 [In Persian].
• Mehri, A. et al. (2010). “Use of Tense in Persian Agrammatic Broca's Aphasia”. Auditory and Vesitibular Research, Vol. 19 (33). Pp. 78-85. [In Persian].
• Mehri, A. (2016). “Comparing the production of complex sentences in Persian patients with post-stroke aphasia and non-damaged people with normal speaking”. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 15 (1).Pp. 28-33.
• Miceli, G.; M. C Silveri; C. Romani & A. Caramazza, (1989). “Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so called agrammatic patients”. Brain and Language, 36.Pp. 447–492.
• Mildner, V. (2008). The cognitive neuroscience of human communication. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Nadeau, S. E. & L. J. Gonzalez-Rothi, (1992), “Morphologic agrammatism following a right hemisphere stroke in a dextral patient”. Brain and Language. 43, Pp. 642–667.
• Nilipour, R. (1993). “Manifestations of Aphasia in Persian”. Tehran. Allameh Tabatabaei University Publication”. Proceedings of the First Theoretical and Applied Linguistic Conference. Pp. 49-63. [In Persian].
• Nilipour, R. (2014). Linguistics & Language Pathology. Tehran: Hermes [In Persian].
• Pollock, J. Y. (1989). “Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry. 20.Pp. 365-424.
• Qorchi, B. & A. Bouchara, (2017), “Agrammatism and other aphasia-related disorders in Moroccan Arabic speaking aphasics”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 6 (1).Pp. 156-168.
• Salimi Khorshidi, A. (2013). Verb Processing in Agrammatic Patients. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University. [In Persian].
• Varlokosta, S. et. al. (2006). “The breakdown of functional categories in Greek aphasia: Evidence from agreement, tense, and aspect". Aphasiology, 20 (8).Pp. 723-743.
• Wenzlaff, M. & Clahsen, (2004); “Tense and agreement in German agrammatism”. Brain and Language, (89) .Pp. 57-68.