Persian Adverbs of Manner Revisited

Authors
G. Karimi-Doostan 1
G. Karimi-Doostan 1
V. Tajalli 2
1 Professor of Linguistics – University of Tehran – Tehran – Iran.
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Linguistics- University of Tehran – Tehran – Iran.
Abstract
The present article investigates the Persian so-called manner adverbs within the Davidsonian event semantics framework aiming at providing a more precise and comprehensive grouping for these adverbs. This category can be divided into two groups of manner and state adverbs. Manner adverbs are event-oriented, i.e. they modify the process of the event. State adverbs are participant-oriented, i.e. they modify the state of the agent or the theme during an event. Manner adverbs are divided into three categories of agent-oriented, resultative and pure manner adverbs. Agent-oriented adverbs modify the subevent of process and the agent; resultative adverbs modify the process and the result state of the event, and pure manner adverbs modify only the process of an event. State adverbs are divided into two subgroups of static depictive and dynamic depictive adverbs. Static depictive adverbs modify the state of the agent or theme during the event, and dynamic depictive adverbs mention the other action done by the agent, simultaneously. Therefore, state adverbs are the modifiers of agents and themes, which are noun phrases and as a result, contrary to the common view, adverbs can be noun modifiers. The only productive adverbial suffix of Persian is "-Ane". It attaches to some nouns and also adjectives which are not able to participate in an event structure, and makes agent-oriented adverbs out of them. The other state and manner adverbs are expressed by adjectives or preposition phrases. Consequently, the current classification of Persian manner adverbs is not accurate. The members of this group are very diverse and need to be treated differently.

Keywords

Subjects

• Ahmadi-Givi, H. & H. Anvari, (2006), Persian Grammar. Tehran: Fatemi .[In Persian]
• Bellert, I. (1977). “On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs”. Linguistic Inquiry 8. Pp. 337–51. 1, 2.1
• Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Irvine. Published 1980 by New York Garland.
• Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Darzi, A. & Z., Labafan-Khosh, (2016). “Lexical feature and syntactic position of obligatory adverbs in Persian”. Language Related Research. Vol.7. No.2. Pp. 73-86. [In Persian]
• Davidson, D. (1967). “The Logical Form of Action Sentences". In The Logic of Decision andAction, N. Rescher (ed.), 105–148. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Davidson, D (1969). “The Individuation of Events”. In: N. Resher (ed.). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pp. 216–234
• Ernst, T. (1984). Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Position in English. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
• Ernst, T. (1987). “Why Epistemic and Manner Modifications Are Exceptional”. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1987. BLS.
• Ernst, T. (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ernst, T. (2004). “Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause”. Lingua .Pp.114.755-777
• Folli, R.; H. Harley & S. Karimi, (2005), “Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates”. Lingua, 115(10).Pp. 1365-1401.
• Geuder,W. (2000). Oriented Adverbs. Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Verbs. PhD dissertation, Konstanz.
• Jackendoff, R. (1972) .Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Mouton de Gruyter.
• Kratzer, A. (1995). “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”. In: G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Pp. 125–175.
• Kratzer, A. (2005). “Building Resultatives”. In Event Arguments in Syntax,Semantics, and Discourse, ed. C. Maienbom and A. Wollenstein-Leisten, 177-212.Ttibingen: Niemeyer.
• Levinson, L. (2007). The Roots of Verbs. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
• Lee, C. (1995). “Resultative and depictive constructions in English”. SNU Journal of Education Research, Vol.5.Pp. 55-90
• Maienborn, C. (2010). "Event Semantics". Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning; Volume 1. (HSK Handbook series), Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Maienborn, C. & M. Schäfer, (2011), “Adverbs and Adverbials”. In: Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K., Portner, P. (eds.). Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning; Vol. 2. (HSK 33.2),Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 1390-1420.
• Meshkat al-dini, M. (1991). An Introduction to Persian Transformational Syntax. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University. [In Persian]
• Morzicky, M. (2014). Modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Natel-Khanlari, P. (1998). Persian Grammar. Tehran: Toos. [In Persian]
• Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The Syntax of Event Structure. Cognition 41.Pp. 47-81.
• Rothstein, S. (2003). “Secondary Predication and Aspectual Structure”. In E.Lang, C. Fabricius-Hansen and C. Maienborn (eds.) Handbook on Adjuncts, Mouton.
• Sabzevari, M. (2015). “The study of structure and formation of the derivational adverbs in standard Farsi with a cognitive approach”. Language Related Research. Vol.6. No.5. Pp. 215-233. [In Persian]
• Thomason, R. & R. Stalnaker, (1973), “A semantic theory of adverbs”. Linguistic Inquiry 4.Pp. 195–220
• Washio, R. (1997). “Resultatives, compositionality and language variation”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6.Pp. 1-49
• Wechsler, S. (1997). “Resultative Predicates and Control”. In Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The Syntax and Semantics of Predication, edited by R. Blight and M. Moosally, 307-321. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Department of Linguistics.
Language Related Research
Volume 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 52
September and October 2019
Pages 259-281