Stylistics of "Physical Metamorphosis" in Child Stories, based on The Tensive Regime of Discourse

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Computational linguistics- Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies- Tehran University- Tehran-Iran
2 French and Latin Language and Literature. Faculty:Letters and Human Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran. Iran.
Abstract
Introduction: "Physical Metamorphosis" is the change in the identity of the acting element or the actress of the story, from a physical representation to another physical expression. In the present study, the word "physical" in addition to the metamorphosis of the body, as a body, also refers to the metamorphosis of the body as an object. "Physical Metamorphosis" either as a knot method, is the creator of a tensive space, or like a resolver method, derived from a tensive space. To examine the aforementioned method, however the choice of the "tensive regime of discourse, is a proportional choice.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to classify the stories in the range of children that have been developed around the "Physical Metamorphosis".

Questions: In this regard, the present study seeks to answer three questions: 1. how the style of the elements involved in metamorphosis take the advantage of tensive regime of discourse to produce meaning in the child story? 2. What is the relationship between the level of consciousness of its transformation element and the amount of its transformation process?

3. Based on the model proposed by Zilberberg, how is it possible to define and illustrate these styles?

Methodology: The two-component stylistics of this study uses two coordinates systems perpendicular to each other: one in terms of time-metamorphosis, which shows the qualitative changes of metamorphic action, in a quantitative period of time, and the other in terms of time-consciousness, which represents the qualitative changes in the consciousness of the actor submissive subject towards his metamorphosis. In this study, "metamorphosis", as well as "the subject's mental awareness of its own metamorphosis", are both considered a qualitative component, alongside linguistic content, and "time" as a quantitative and extrinsic component. The present study uses a descriptive analysis approach.

Conclusions: 1) Zilberberg believes in five styles or modes of presence: style of modality, style of efficiency, style of existence, inclusive and exclusive style. According to the present study, this stylistics can be divided into two groups. The first group includes style of modality, style of efficiency, and style of existence. These three styles are relative to each other being in complementary distribution; that is, although all three are stressful, and have relatively similar functions; but none of both items come together. The second group includes, inclusive and exclusive style. Both components are in complementary distribution relative to each other; but none of the three styles of the first group, with any of the two styles of the second group, are in complementary distribution; For example, the stress space can be both style of modality (from the first group) and inclusive style (from the second group).

2) The first group, which includes three styles of modality, efficiency and existence, divides both the metamorphic process and the pattern of awareness of the metamorphic element towards its own metamorphosis. Based on these two components, we can identify the cognitive style pattern of physical metamorphosis in children's stories based on two components: The first is metamorphosis at the biological level, and the other is metamorphosis at the phenomenological level.

3) Children's stories, which are based on bodily metamorphosis, follow six two-component models: I) The efficiency, with the phenomenon of modality, II)The double efficiency, III)The double modality, IV)The modality with the phenomenon of efficiency, V)The existence, VI) Without the phenomenon.

This study, for the first time, generalizes Zilberberg's one-component stylistic model to two-component stylistic paradigm. In two-component stylistics, the first component represents the objective process of the biological changes of the transformed personality, and the second component represents the phenomenological changes that occur in mind of the transformed personality. That is, the coordinate system based on "time-metamorphosis" corresponds to the first component, and shows how the objective the process of metamorphosis is. The coordinate system based on "time-awareness" corresponds to the second component, and shows how the personality is aware and mentally informed of its metamorphosis. In this article, the representation of stress axes (extent and intensity axes) are completely consistent with mathematical paradigms.

Significance of the study: Regarding the frequency of the application of the "Physical Metamorphosis" in children story, and the lack of theoretical research on this field, the necessity of conducting a research in this field sounds beneficial.

Keywords

Subjects


اکبری زاده، فاطمه و مرضیه محصص (1396). نشانه معناشناسی گفتمان تبلیغی موسی. دوماهنامه جستارهای زبانی. آذر و دی. د8. ش5. پیاپی40. صص318-293.
بابک معین، مرتضی (1394). معنا به مثابۀ تجربۀ زیسته: گذر از نشانه شناسی کلاسیک به نشانه شناسی با دورنمای پدیدارشناختی. تهران: سخن.
تیموریان، آناهیتا (1396). قایق کاغذی. چ اول. تهران: فاطمی.
حسن زاده، فرهاد (1384). آقارنگی‌وگربه ناقلا. چ اول. تهران: کانون پرورش فکری کودک و نوجوان.
زنجانبر، امیرحسین (1398). بی یا. تهران.
ـــــــــ (1397). شگرد روایی «همانی تراجهانی» در داستانهای کودک و نوجوان: با رویکرد هستی شناختی. دوفصلنامه روایت شناسی.
زنجانبر، امیرحسین؛فاطمه بستانی؛ غلامحسین کریمی دوستان (1398). تحلـــــــــیل استعاره روانکاوی داستان کودکانه «یک داستان محشر» برپایۀ نظریۀ ناخودآگاه زبانی. دوفصلنامه پژوهشنامه نقدادبی و بلاغت. بهاروتابستان. سال8. ش1.
شعیری، حمیدرضا (1385). تجزیه و تحلیل نشانه معناشناسی گفتمان. تهران: سمت.
ـــــــــ (1397). مبانی معناشناسی نوین. تهران. سمت.
ـــــــــ (1395). نشانه معناشناسی ادبیات. تهران:دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
عباسی، علی(1395). نشانه معناشناسی روایی مکتب پاریس.تهران: دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی.
کاکاوند، کامبیز (1381). صفرکله گنده. تهران: شباویز.
مهرنگار منصور، راضیه چیتی، ابراهیم خدایار، اصغر فهیمی فر. (1392). تحلیل ترانشانه دگردیسی و آیین تصرف در شاهنامه به روایت تصویر. دوفصلنامه ادبیات تطبیقی. بهار و تابستان. صص 128-154.
واثق عباسی، عبدالله& یعقوب فولادی (1396). دگردیسی اسطوره آفرینش مهری در عرفان ایرانی اسلامی با تکیه بر اشعار مولوی. فصلنامه ادبیات عرفانی و اسطوره شناختی. ش47. تابستان.صص43-62
وجدانی، عبدالحسین (1348). عموغلام (مجموعه داستان)، تهران: امیرکبیر.

Akbarizade ,A & Mohases,M. (2017). "The Study of Sign-Semantics in Missionary Discourse of Musa". Language Related Research. Tarbiat Modarres University. No: 5(Vol:8) . Pp:293-318.[in Persian].
Babak moin, M. (2015). Meaning as Live Experience: Passing from Classieical Semiotics to Semiotics with a Phenomenological Perspective. Tehran: Sokhan. [in Persian].
Timurian, A. (2017). Paper Boat. Tehran: Fatemi. [in Persian].
Hassanzadeh, F. (2005). The colorful and cute cat, or, that's how it was. Illus: Ali Khodai. Tehran: Fostering Children's and Youth. [in Persian].
Zanjanbar, A. (2019). Without "ya". Illus: Iraj Esmaeili. Tehran: [in Persian].
ـــــــــ. (2018). narrative technique of "Transworld identity" in child and adolescent stories, with an ontological approach. Narrative Studies. [in Persian].
Zanjanbar, A; F,Bostani& Gh,Karimi Dostan.(2019). The psychoanalytic analysis of metaphor of "thing from nothing" childish story, based on unconscious language theory. Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric. No:2(Vol:8). [in Persian].
Shairi,H. (2006). The Analysis of Discource Semantics. Ed:1st. Tehran: side organization. [in Persian].
ـــــــــ. (2018). The Fundamentals of Modern Semantics. Ed:5th. Tehran: side organization. [in Persian].
ـــــــــ. (2016). Semantics of Literature: theory and Method of Literary Discource of Analysis. Ed:1st .Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [in Persian].
Abbasi, A. (2016). The Significance of the Parisian School of Validity. Ed:1st Tehran:Shahid Beheshti University. [in Persian].
Kakavand, K.(2002). Zero Crusher. Illus: Samira Alikhanzadeh. Tehran: Shabaviz. [in Persian].
Mehrangar, M; R,Chiti; E,Khodayar & A,Fahimi Far.(2013). "Transhuman analysis of metamorphosis and ritual of sympathy in Shahnameh, narrative of the image". Specialty Letter of the Academy (Comparative Literature). No:1 (Vol:4). 7th series. Pp:128-154. [in Persian].
Vaseq Abbasi, A & Foolādi, Y. (2017). "Transformation of Mithraic Myth of Creation in Iranian-Islamic Mysticism :Based on Rumi’s Poems". Mytho-Mystic Literature. No:47 (Vol:13). Pp:343-362. [in Persian].
Vojdani, A. (1969). Uncle ghulam. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [in Persian].
Andersen, H. (1999). The Ugly Duckling. Illus: Jerry Pinkney. New york: Harper Collins.
Anscombre, J.et Ducrot O. (1974). "L Argumentation dans la langue". in Lagage.Paris:Larouss, n:42.
Collodi, C. (2012). Pinocchio. Illus: Fulvio Testa. Trans: Geoffrey Brock.New York: NYRB. [in English].
Dahl, R. (1983). The Witches. Illus: Quentin Blake.London: Jonathan Cape.
Gilman, Ph. (1993). Something from nothing. New York: Scholastic Press.
Hillary, R. (2016). The Frog Prince. Illus: Jane D Abbott. London:Franklin Watts.
Kafka, F.(2014). The Metamorphosis. Trans: Susan new York:Bernofsky.W.W. Norton & Company. [in English]
Lewis, C.S. (1998). The Last Battle. London: The Bodley Head.
Mc Hale, B. (1978). Postmodernist Fiction. . Ed:1st. Abingdon: Routledge.
Silverstein, Sh.(2006). The Missing Piece Meets the Big O. Ed:24th. New york: Harper Collins.
Steiner, J. (1977). The Bear who Wanted to Stay a Bear. Illus: Jorg Muller. London: Hutchinson & Co.