Iranian EFL Teachers' Beliefs about Dynamic Assessment: Does Context Make a Difference?

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Dynamic assessment (DA), premised on Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory (SCT), constitutes a valuable venue for language teachers to promote the dialectical praxis and awareness of language assessment and teaching in the EFL context. In spite of the surge of interest in the importance of DA in assessing the dynamically emergent abilities, little has been written down regarding EFL teachers' attitudes toward DA. The current study attempted to fill that void by unearthing Iranian EFL teachers' beliefs about DA and also to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between university and language institute teachers' attitudes with regard to DA. To this end, forty Iranian EFL teachers in the two contexts (i.e., universities and language institutes) were selected through purposive and snowball sampling procedures. Adopting an exploratory design, the researchers collected the data through an Email interview. The results of the Chi-square tests indicated that there is no significant difference in the attitudes of university and language institute teachers toward DA, and both groups held a positive attitude toward it. In addition, the content analysis of the data resulted in the emergence of three major themes namely, teachers' classroom assessment practices, EFL teacher's attitudes toward DA, and impediments to applying DA principles in EFL classes. The findings of this study cater for implications for teachers to voice their concerns about the edifice of language testing and assessment in Iran.

Keywords

Subjects


Ahangari, S., & Alizadeh, K. (2015). The reasoning towards using dynamic assessment in EFL (English as a foreign language) educational system in Iran. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(2), 534-540.
AlAmin, M., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The examination system in Bangladesh and its impact: On curriculum, students, teachers and society. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-18.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. https://doi:10.1186/s40468-018-0060-9
Bax, S. (1997). Roles for a teacher educator in context sensitive teacher education. ELT Journal, 51(3), 232– 241. https://doi:10.1093/elt/51.3.232
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
Babaii, E., & Asadnia, F. (2019). A long walk to language assessment literacy: EFL teachers' reflection on language assessment research and practice. Reflective Practice, 20(6), 745-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1688779
Babaii, E., Molana, K., & Nazari, M. (2020). Contributions of assessment-related critical incidents to language teacher identity development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1824234
Bliem, C. L., & Davinroy, K. H. (1997). Teachers' beliefs about assessment and instruction in literacy. CSE technical report 421. University of California.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers' beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr065

Brown, G. T. L., Gebril, A., & Michaelides, M. P. (2019). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: A global phenomenon or a global localism. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00016
Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010). Teacher enquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565545
Burhan-Horasanlı, E., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2016). Reflective practice-oriented online discussions: A study on EFL teachers' reflection-on, in and for-action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 372-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.002

Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1992). The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. International
Journal of Disability Development and Education, 39(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655920390203
Cheng, L. Rogers, T. & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors' classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360-389. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0265532204lt288oa
Cohen, L., Manion, D., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in Education (7th Ed.). Rutledge.
Coniam, D., & Falvey, P. (2013). Ten years on: The Hong Kong language proficiency assessment for teachers of English (LPATE). Language Testing, 30(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265532212459485
Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practice in Australia and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 21(3), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0265532204lt286oa
Dashti, S. M. (2019). EFL teachers' beliefs and practices about classroom assessment: A multiple case study in the context of Kuwait (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Toronto, Ontario.
Ebadi, S., Vakilifard, A., & Bahramlou, K. (2018). Learning Persian vocabulary through reading: The effects of noticing and computerized dynamic assessment. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507176
Es-hagi Sardrood, S. J. (2011). Dynamic assessment in Iranian EFL classrooms: A post-method enquiry. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 4(2), 47-63.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2014). Reflective practice in ESL teacher development groups: From practices to principles. Palgrave Macmillan.
Firoozi, T., Razavipour, K., & Ahmadi, A. (2019). The language assessment literacy needs of Iranian EFL teachers with a focus on reformed assessment policies. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0078-7
Gan, L., & Lam, R. (2020). Understanding university English instructors' assessment training needs in the Chinese context. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00113-2
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Hamilton, S. (2014). Are traditional assessment methods appropriate in contemporary higher education? https://www.bpp.com/delegate/r/content/contemporary-higher-education.pdf.
Hessels-Schlatter, C., & Hessels, M. G. (2009). Clarifying some issues in dynamic assessment: Comments on Karpov and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(3), 246-251. http://doi 10.1891/1945–8959.8.3.246
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385-402. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090158
James, N. (2016). Using email interviews in qualitative educational research: Creating space to think and time to talk. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(2), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2015.1017848
Karimi, M. N., & Shafiee, Z. (2014). Iranian EFL teachers' perceptions of dynamic assessment: Exploring the role of education and length of service. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 143-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.10
Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
Khader, F. R. (2012). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and actual classroom practices in social studies instruction. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(1), 73- 92.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Critical language pedagogy: A post-method perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes, 22(4), 539-550.
Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32(2), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265532214554321
Lam, R. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong. System, 81, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006
Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and
assessment, plenary speeches, Language Teaching, 42(3), 355-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005569
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Language testing and assessment (pp. 273–284). Springer.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Vygotsky's teaching- assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 312- 330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030903338509
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygostkian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168810383328
Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1961.tb02104.x
McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800402
McNamara, T. (2012). Poststructuralism and its challenges for applied linguistics. Applied
Linguistics, 33(5), 473-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams055
Matese, G., Griesdorn, J., & Edelson, D.C. (2002). Teacher belief about assessment in inquiry- based science: Research to inform professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Conference. LA.
Miller, P. V., & Cannell, C. F. (1997). Interviewing for social research. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement (2nd Ed.) (pp. 361-370). Elsevier Science.
Mohammadi, S., Babaii, E., Hashemi, M. (2020). Examining Iranian EFL teachers' perceptions regarding the importance and application of dynamic assessment. Foreign Language Research Journal, 9(4), 1305-1338. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2019.264775.544
Nazari, A. (2017). Dynamic assessment in higher education English language classes: A lecturer perspective. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 100-118. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3404757
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543062003307
Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania.
Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323-340. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method—Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586897
Rahim, S. S. A., Venville, G., & Chapman, A. (2009). Classroom assessment: Juxtaposing teachers' beliefs with classroom practices. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education: International Education Research Conference. http://aare.edu.au/09pap/abd091051.pdf.
Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v2i2.25956
Sadeghi, K., & Jabbarnejad, L. (2012). An evaluation of EFL program objectives at tertiary level in Iran. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AJTLHE), 4(2), 1-16.
Saniei, A. (2012). Dynamic assessment: A call for change in assessment. The Asian EFL Journal, 59(4), 4-19.
Shafaghi, M., & Estaji, M. (2020). Teacher evaluation training and its effect on EFL teacher evaluators' perceptions and practices. MEXTOL Journal, 44(4), 1-14.
Shohamy, E. (2005). The power of tests over teachers: The power of teachers over tests. In Tedick, D. J. (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp.101-111). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko. E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press.
Stiggins, R. J. (1993). Teacher training in assessment: Overcoming the neglect. Teacher Training in Measurement and Assessment Skills, 28-40. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/burosteachertraining/4/
Troudi, S., Coombe, C.,& Al-Hamliy, M. (2009). EFL teachers' views of English language
assessment in higher education in the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. TESOL
Quarterly, 43(3), 546-555. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00252.x
Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. In D. Tzuriel (Ed), Dynamic assessment of young children (pp. 63-75). Springer US.
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
Wilson, S. M. (1990). The secret garden of teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(3), 204-209.
Yan, X., & Fan, J. (2021). Am I qualified to be a language tester? Understanding the development of language assessment literacy across three stakeholder groups. Language Testing, 38(2), 219-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220929924
Zoghi, M., & Malmeer, E. (2013). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL learners’ intrinsic motivation, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 584-591.