The Importance and Role of Interactive Meta-discourse Markers in Discourse Study of Persian Scientific Articles

Articles in Press

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
T. Taremi 1
M. Ghayoomi 2
1 University of Sistan & Baluchestan
2 Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
Abstract
The study of scientific articles, as the main genre of scientific productions and an important means of information exchange among the members of the scientific community, has received increasing attention during the past few decades. In scientific discourse study, textual structure and coherence require the writers to use various meta-discourse markers, including interactive and interactional meta-discourse markers, and their appropriate strategies. In the current research, the category of interactive meta-discourse marker based on Hyland's model is studied. We use a corpus-based approach to analyze Persian scientific research articles in the field of humanities and to find out the importance and role of interactive meta-discourse elements in Persian scientific papers.

For this purpose, we randomly select and analyze 800 abstracts of scientific research articles from 16 fields of humanities from the Comprehensive Portal of Humanities. Examining the data reveals the importance of the use of meta-discourse in the text in such a way that approximately one marker of interactive meta-discourse marker is found among every 15 words. Also, the analysis of the corpus indicates that frame markers are the most frequently used interactive meta-discourse marker in the corpus, and transition and code glosses are in the next rank with a little distance from frame markers. Endophoric and evidentials markers obtained the lowest frequency in the corpus. At the end, suggestions and corrections are provided to make Hyland’s concept more compatible with the discourse features of Persian scientific articles.

Keywords

Subjects

Soltani, R., & Shokrpour, N. (2021) vaz?iyyate ?estefāde ?az nešāngarhāye farāgoftemān dar maqālāte pezeškiye iran: motāle?eyye tatbiqi [Metadiscourse Markers in Iranian Medical Articles: A Comparative Study]. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Science. 31(691): 92-100.
Taremi, T., Taki, G., & Yousefian, P. vākāviye peyykare bonyāde farāgoftemāne tabādoli dar maqālāte elmi-pažuhiye fārsi [The Corpus- Based Investigation of Interactive Metadiscourse in Persian Referent Researches: Hylandʼs Model (2005)]. Language Studies 10(2): 129-151.
Abdi, R. (2011). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles: a study of the differences across subsections. The journal of teaching language skills, 3 (1), Ser. 62/4, 1- 16.
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Balood, S. (2014). Meta-Discourse and Discourse Markers in the Writing of Iranian and Native Speakers of English in Applied Linguistic Journals. M.A. thesis in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Shiraz University.
Congjun, M., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135- 148.
Crismore, A., & Fransworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (ed.) the writing scholar: studies in academic discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 118- 136.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish University students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39- 71.
D’Angelo, L. (2008). Gender Identity and Authority in Academic Book Reviews: An Analysis of Metadiscourse across Disciplines. Linguistica e Filologia, 27, 205- 221.
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825.
Gezgin, B. & Bas, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45- 62.
Hewings, M. (2006). Introduction. In: Hewings, M. (Ed.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications (pp. 79–92). London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum.
Shekouhi, H., & Talati Bagh Siahi, A. (2009). metadiscourse functions in English and Persian Sociology Articles: A Study in Contrastive Rhetoric. pozań studies in contemporary linguistics, 45 (4), 549- 568.
ShokrPour, N., Soltani, R. (2021). Metadiscourse Markers in Iranian Medical Articles: A
Comparative Study . Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 31 (196), 92- 100. [In Persian].
Taremi, T., Taki, G. & Yousefian, P. (2019). The Corpus- based Investigation of Interactive Metadiscourse in the Persian Research Articles: Hylandʼs Model (2005). Journal of Language Research, 10 (2), 129- 151. [In Persian].
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 129- 48.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93.
Zarei, GH. R., & Mansoori, S. (2007). Metadiscourse in Academic Prose. A Contrastive Analysis of English and Persian Research Articles. The Asian ESP journal, 3(2), 24- 40.
Language Related Research

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 13 July 2025