Post-Humanist Pedagogies in E-Learning for English Language Teaching: Insights from Indonesian Doctorate Students

نوع مقاله : مقاله تحقیق

نویسندگان
Universitas Negeri Malang
چکیده
This study investigates the integration of post-humanist pedagogies in e-learning for English language teaching (ELT) through the perspectives of Indonesian doctoral students. Post-humanist principles, emphasizing interconnectedness and collaboration, are explored within digital language education contexts. Conducted at Universitas Negeri Malang, the study employed a sequential mixed-methods approach involving 28 participants. Data collection included closed-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, focusing on three key dimensions: relationality, agency and autonomy, and multiplicity and diversity. Findings underscored the preference for collaborative digital learning environments, highlighting peer interaction and the role of adaptive technology in fostering personalized instruction and learner autonomy. The participants also emphasized the importance of integrating sustainability-focused content in language courses to promote ecological awareness. This research advocates for the transformative potential of post-humanist pedagogies in enhancing inclusive, learner-centered language learning experiences that support linguistic diversity and intercultural understanding. Future studies should explore the scalability and socio-political implications of these pedagogical approaches across diverse educational settings to address broader societal challenges and promote equitable education practices.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Allender, P. (2013). Derrida and humanism: Some implications for post-humanist political and educational Practice. Power and Education, 5(3), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2013.5.3.318
Banerji, D. (2019). Posthuman perspectivism and technologies of the self. Sophia, 58(4), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00756-x
Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (pp. 13–32). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
Brinkmann, S. (2017). Humanism after posthumanism: or qualitative psychology after the “posts.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1282568
Chappell, K., Natanel, K., & Wren, H. (2023). Letting the ghosts in: Re-designing HE teaching and learning through posthumanism. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), 2066-2088. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1952563
Chiew, F. (2018). A posthuman pedagogy with Rancière and Bateson. Critical Studies in Education, 59(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1194301
Christensen, B. A. (2014). Why do we care about post‐humanism? A critical note. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12033
Dobakhti, L. (2020). The process of enhancing validity, reliability, and ethics in research. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 12(2), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJALS.2020.5978
Dobakhti, L. & Zohrabi, M. (2017). Goals, dimensions, and design of program investigation. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 9(20), 75-91.
Elfert, M. (2023). Humanism and democracy in comparative education. Comparative Education, 59(3), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2023.2185432
Forlano, L. (2017). Posthumanism and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.08.001
Gane, N. (2005). Radical post-humanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405053718
Gough, A., & Gough, N. (2017). Beyond cyborg subjectivities: Becoming-posthumanist educational researchers. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1174099
Howlett, C. (2018). Teacher education and posthumanism. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(1), 106-118.
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Knox, J. (2016). Posthumanism and the MOOC: opening the subject of digital education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9516-5
Kuby, C. R., Spector, K., & Thiel, J. J. (2018). Posthumanism and literacy education. Knowing/Becoming/Doing Literacies, 1.
Mañero, J. (2019). Review of Jeremy Knox (2016). Posthumanism and the massive open online course: Contaminating the subject of global education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00040-3
Mulcahy, D. (2022). Enacting affirmative ethics in education: A materialist/posthumanist framing. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(7), 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1907744
Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679750
Porpora, D. V. (2017). Dehumanization in theory: Anti-humanism, non-humanism, post-humanism, and trans-humanism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1340010
Prem, E. (2024). Principles of digital humanism: A critical post-humanist view. Journal of Responsible Technology, 17, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100075
Sidebottom, K. (2019). Disruptive pedagogies for teacher education: The power of Potentia in posthuman times. In: Taylor, C.A., Bayley, A. (eds) Posthumanism and Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14672-6_13
Slamet, J., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Assessing gamification-based LMS for EFL students: A self-directed learning framework. Studies in Linguistics, Culture & FLT, 12(2). https://doi/org/10.46687/CVHT3942
Slamet, J., & Mukminatien, N. (2024). Developing an online formative assessment instrument for listening skill through LMS. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 188–211. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270382
Stables, A., & Scott, W. (2001). Post‐humanist liberal pragmatism? Environmental education out of modernity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00225
Taylor, C.A. (2017). Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education. High Educ, 74, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9994-y
Ulmer, J. B. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336806