Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic
writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in
applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008
Anthony, L. (2021). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Waseda.
https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language
structure and use. Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity,
elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Biber D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of
written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223–250.
https://doi.10.1017/S1360674311000025
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic
change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776
Biber D., Gray, B., & Poonpoon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to
measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly,
45(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Biber D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Contrasting the grammatical complexities of
conversation and academic writing: Implications for EAP writing development and
teaching. LIF – Language in Focus Journal, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0001
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of
spoken and written English. Longman.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken
and written English. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232
Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2021). #LancsBox v. 5.x. [software package].
http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen,
& I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity,
accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Commission on Higher Education. (2009). National higher education research agenda 2
(2009-2018) (NHERA 2). Commission on Higher Education.
https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NHERA-2.pdf
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999
Crystal, D. (2008). ‘Two thousand million?’, English Today, 24(1), 3–6.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078408000023
Dayag, D. T. (2012). Philippine English. In E. L. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in
Southeast Asia: Features, policy, and language in use (pp. 91–100). John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42
Dayag, D. T. (2014). Preposition stranding and pied-piping in Philippine English: A corpus-
based study. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim & H. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia:
The future of English as a global language (pp. 102–119). Cambridge University
Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107 477186.008
Dolnicar, S., & Chapple, A. (2015). The readability of articles in tourism journals. Annals of
Tourism Research, 52, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.03.003
Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D. (2020). Doing corpus linguistics with a corpus.
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888790
Esfandari, R., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). A corpus-based analysis of noun phrase complexity in
research article part-genres in applied linguistics and clinical medicine. Language Related Research, 13(3), 139–173. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.13.3.6
Giampieri, P. (2020). Online corpora for second language teaching. The Linguistics Journal,
14(2), 50–70.
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of
the story. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993/1996). Writing science: Literacy and discursive
power. Falmer Press. (Vol. first published in 1993, republished in 1996).
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209936
Hernandez, H. P. (2021). Syntactic description of research articles across disciplines
[Doctoral dissertation]. Philippine Normal University–Manila .
Hernandez, H. P. (2022a). Compressed and implicit syntactic features of L2 English
academic research writing by Filipino research writers across disciplines: A cross-
analysis. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(1),
51–73. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2201051H
Hernandez, H. P. (2022b). Prepositional phrases as noun postmodifiers in disciplinary
research articles authored by Filipino researchers: A cross-examination. International
Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 21–44.
Hernandez, H. P., & Genuino, C. F. (2022). Compression and implicitness through dependent
phrases in academic ESL writing by Filipino researchers across disciplines. LEARN
Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 546–577.
Hutter, J. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of noun modification in empirical research articles
in applied linguistics [Master’s thesis]. Portland State University.
Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In
K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. Peter Lang.
https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse.
Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Housen, A., & De Clercq, B. (2019). Variation in syntactic
complexity: Introduction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12255
Mabayo, R. (2019, May 24). Considering history and narratives as Spain and the Philippines
approach 500th anniversary: At the 500th anniversary of the arrival of Spain in the
Philippines, which narrative do we celebrate? The Diplomat.
https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/considering-history-and-narratives-as-spain-and-the-philippines-approach-500th-anniversary/
Makovskaya, L., & Radjabzade, S. (2022). Source use by EFL undergraduate students:
Challenges and success in process-based writing. Language Related Research, 13(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.13.3.10
Malakhovskaya, M., Beliaeva, L., & Kamshilova, O. (2021). Teaching noun-phrase
composition in EAP/ESP context: A corpus-assisted approach to overcome a didactic gap. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2102257M
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh
University Press.
Nguyen, T. T. L., & Suwannabubpha, S. (2021). EFL writing at Thai secondary schools:
Teachers and students’ views, difficulties and expectations. Language Related Research, 12(3), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.7
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A
research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Otto, J., Partow-Navid, P., & Doshi, M. (2011). Revisiting the readability of management
information systems journals again. Research in Higher Education Journal, 15, 77–84.
Pallotti, G. (2014). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research,
31(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435
Rottensteiner, S. (2010). Structure, function and readability of new textbooks in relation to
comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3892–3898.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.611
Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese
comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. Journal of
English for Academic Purposes, 36, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.001
Sawyer, A., Laran, J., & Xu, J. (2008). The readability of marketing journals: Are award-
winning articles better written? Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 108-117.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.1.108
Senate of the Philippines. (2013, January 21). Senate declares Chinese New Year as special
working holiday [Press release].
https://web.archive.org/web/20210516035425/http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2013/0121_prib1.asp
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
Wu, Z., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca
academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres:
Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System, 97,
1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427
جستارهای زبانی