The Effect of Topic on EFL Writing by Vietnamese Tertiary Students: Insights from Combining a Lexical Richness Analysis with Student Self-Reports

نوع مقاله : مقاله تحقیق

نویسندگان
1 Faculty of English, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University, 57 Nguyen Khoa Chiem, Hue, Vietnam
2 School of School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, VZ 418, Von Zedlitz Building, 26 / 28 Kelburn Parade, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand
چکیده
Lexical richness in written language production has been examined in different contexts and in relation to different genres but research into the effects of within-genre topics on lexical richness is still limited and takes little account of learners’ perspectives. The present study therefore sought to understand the effects of topics on lexical richness (lexical density, lexical diversity and lexical sophistication) in written essays by Vietnamese EFL learners. Data were collected from sixty-four English-major university students who each wrote four essays on four different topics across two genres (persuasive and descriptive) in their normal classes as progress tests. Ten students were also interviewed after they had completed all the essays to understand their perceptions of the writing topics. Lextutor’s VocabProfile was used to obtain measures of lexical density, lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. The results showed mixed effects of writing topics on these three lexical measures. Learner perspectives provided insights into how cognitive and affective individual factors contributed to the complexity of topic influence. Pedagogical implications are discussed in regard to how to enhance productive lexical use in writing through task selection and instructional planning.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Aluthman, E. S. (2017). Compiling an OPEC word list: A corpus-informed lexical analysis.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(2), 78–91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.78
Anthony, L. (2020). Resources for researching vocabulary. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 561–590). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586
Atak, N., Saricaoglu, A. (2021). Syntactic complexity in L2 learners’ argumentative writing: Developmental stages and the within-genre topic effect, Assessing writing, 47, (100506). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100506
Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (2001). Introduction. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading–writing connections. (pp. 1–14). University of Michigan Press.
Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System, 69, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.004
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic
change in writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx060
Carroll, J.B. (1964). Language and thought. Prentice-Hall.
Casanave, C. P. (2010). Distancing: From real life experiences to final research
report in qualitative inquiry with multilingual participants. In the 2010 Symposium
on Second Language Writing, University of Murcia, Spain.
Catalán, R. M. J., & Llach, M. P. A. (2017). CLIL or time? Lexical profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. System, 66, 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.016
Chen, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). A comparative study of lexical richness in English writing by Chinese senior high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2100739
Cho, M. (2019). The effects of prompts on L2 writing performance and engagement. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12411
Cobb, T. (2015). VP-compleat. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587951
Coxhead, A. (2018). Vocabulary and second language writing. In J. I. Liontas (ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp.1–6). John Wiley & Son. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0533
Crossley, S. A. (2020). Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Predicting
the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Testing, 29, 243–263. https://doi.org/0265532211419331
Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30(4), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009
Garner, J., Crossley, S., & Kyle, K. (2019). N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency. System, 80, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.001
Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2016). Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment: Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.001
González, M. C. (2017) The contribution of lexical diversity to college-level writing. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.342
Goodfellow, R., Lamy, M. N., & Jones, G. (2002). Assessing learners’ writing using lexical frequency. ReCALL, 14(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344002001118
Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analyzing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 198, 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477
Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgements of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Palmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209936
He, L., & Shi, L. (2012). Topical knowledge and ESL writing. Language Testing, 29(3) 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212436659
Herdan, G. (1964). Quantitative linguistics. Butterworths.
Higginbotham, G., & Reid, J. (2019). The lexical sophistication of second language learners’ academic essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.002
Johnson, M.D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
Johnson, W. (1944). Studies in language behavior: I. A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093508
Kim, J. Y. (2014). Predicting L2 writing proficiency using linguistic complexity measures: A corpus-based study. English Teaching, 69(4), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.69.4.201412.27
Kim, M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12447
Kosmos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in sec-
ond language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 665–680
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). Another step to be taken: Rethinking the endpoint of the interlanguage continuum. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later (pp. 203-220). John Benjamins.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written
production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
Lee, C., Ge, H.,& Chung, E. (2021). What linguistic features distinguish and predict L2 writing quality? A study of examination scripts written by adolescent Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong, System, 97, (102461). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102461
Li, Y. (2000). Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in task-based e-mail activities. System, 28(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00009-9
Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students' engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.002
Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners' oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x
Maamuujav, U. (2021). Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays, Assessing Writing, 49, (100540). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100540
Malvern, D., Richards, B., J., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). A theoretical and empirical evaluation of vocd. Language Testing, 24, 459–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767
Meara, P. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh037
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27, 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
Nasseri, M., & Thompson, P. (2021). Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences. Assessing Writing, 47, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100511
Nation, I.S.P. (2013) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.73042
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle-Cengage.
Newman, L.W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed). Pearson.
Nguyen, B.T.T. (2021). Using AntConc software to facilitate feedback giving on students’ use of lexical words in writing. TESOL Journal, 12(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.597
Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5
Park, S. (2013). Lexical analysis of Korean university students' narrative and argumentative essays. English Teaching, 68(3), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.131
Pupore, G. (2014). The influence of content on adult L2 learners’ task motivation: An interest theory perspective. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 69–90. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/22660
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Ryoo, Y. (2018). Comparing lexical diversity and lexical sophistication in Korean. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2018.21.3.63
Sadeghi, K & Dilmaghani, S. K. (2013). The relationship between lexical diversity and genre in Iranian EFL learners’ writings. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,4(2), 328-334. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.328-334
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5070/L4111005027
Templin, M. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships: The University of Minnesota Press.
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. Perren and J.L.M. Trim (eds), Applications of Linguistics (pp.443–452). Cambridge University Press.
Yang, W, Lu, X., & Weigle, S.C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002
Yin, R. K (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd edition). The Guilford Press.
Yoon, H. (2017). Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 66, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.007
Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp024
Zheng, Y. (2016). The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English. System, 56, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.007