The Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Teaching a General English University Course, and Associated Individual Factors

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
A. Eghtesadi Roudi
M. Pazhouhesh
Assistant professor of ELT, Department of English Langauge Teaching, Farhangain University, Mashhad, Iran
10.29252/LRR.14.2.2
Abstract
Flipped classroom is one of the relatively new teaching methods in which teaching takes place outside the classroom and class time is devoted to practice, and learning is established under the supervision of the teacher. Various studies in the world and in Iran have examined the effectiveness of flipped learning in teaching English, but these studies have been done either in the context of schools and institutes or with English language college students. This study examines students’ attitudes towards the flipped classroom, and the effectiveness of flipped learning in General English courses at Farhangian University. Findings show that students are satisfied with the flipped classroom and prefer it to traditional classes. Based on the results of paired and independent t-tests, flipped learning improves students' learning in General English courses. In addition, gender can affect the effectiveness of flipped learning, but students' field of study does not have such a role. Based on the findings of this study, flipped learning can used to increase the effectiveness of General English courses in face-to-face and virtual classes.



1. Introduction

Successful teaching and the improvement of learners’ achievement is undoubtedly the goal of all educational systems, and the advent and availability of technology to the public, has made this goal more attainable in recent years. Flipped classroom model is one of the innovations in teaching made possible through technology, which is an attempt to respond to challenges in traditional teaching by devoting more time to active learning in the classroom using a blended learning approach. In flipped classroom model, the direct teaching presented to the whole class changes into interactive personalized teaching which occurs outside the classroom, and hence the classroom becomes a dynamic and interactive learning environment to consolidate learning (Kaviani et al., 2018).

Although many studies have studied the effectiveness of flipped learning in schools and language institutes in Iran, and in college contexts overseas, no rigorous study has been devoted to this issue in university contexts in Iran till the date of conducting this study. Therefore, this study aimed to investiage the effectiveness of flipped learning in a general English course in Farhangian University, and also to review students reactions to this experience.



2. Methodology

In this study, which was conducted in the second semester of the academic year 2017-2018 at Farhangian University of Mashhad, eight general English Language classes of the undergraduate course in Shahid Beheshti Campus (males) and Shahid Hasheminejad Campus (females) were randomly selected to participate in the research. These classes included 300 students (103 females and 197 males) from different fields of study in humanities and science.

The teaching in the classes was done following flipped format until the mid-term exam, and then, classes were taught through traditional methods. In this way, each of the students had two scores, one of which was obtained after the reverse training and the other after the traditional training.

A mid-term and a final exam were used in the research, each of which consisted of 50 multiple-choice, short-answer, and essay-type items. The tests measured knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, and reading and comprehension of the learners. At the end of the semester, the attitude questionnaire about the flipped classroom, which was adapted and translated from the study of Hsieh, et al. (2017) was administered to the students.



3. Results

These results showed that the students were satisfied with their experience in the flipped classroom. According to Hsieh, et al. (2017), the items in the questionnaire measure four aspects of motivation, effectiveness, participation and overall satisfaction of learners. They did not provide items that measured each construct, but since all items had means above the midpoint of the scale, the findings suggest that students believed that the flipped classroom motivated them, and it has been more effective and attractive for them.

Moreover, the results of the paired t test to compare the performance of the flipped and tranditiona classrooms (t = 8.08, df = 299, p<0.05), showd a significant difference between the students' grades obtained after reverse education and the grades obtained from traditional education.

To study the effectiveness of flipped classroom for the two genders , an independent samples t-test was run. According to the results (t=-2.14, p<.05), there was a significant difference between the scores of women and men as a result of flipped learning, and women had a higher mean. This indicates that flipped classroom has been more effective for women.



4. Discussion

The results of this study about students' satisfaction with the flipped classroom are in line with the findings of other survey studies about the flipped classroom using other questionnaires (Baker, 2000; Lage et al., 2000; Mehring, 2015).

The finding of he effectiveness of flipped learning is consistent with theoretical discussions about the effectiveness of the reverse method (Bergman & Sams, 2012; Kim et al., 2018). The better performance of students in flipped classroom is also in line with the results of other studies conducted in the field of English language teaching and flipped learning (Farsi et al., 2020; Hsieh, 2017; Hung, 2014; Sahragard et al., 2020).



5. Conclusion

According to the findings of this research, one of the effective ways to improve English learning in general language classes in the university, regardless of the field of study, is to use flipped learning so that students who have different backgrounds can wathc the teaching video as many times as they need before coming to the class, and use the opportunity to practice in the classroom to consolidate learning and solve possible problems.


Keywords

Subjects

Abdullah, M. Y., Hussin, S., Hammad, Z. M., & Ismail, K. (2021). Exploring the effects of flipped classroom model implementation on EFL learners’ self-confidence in English speaking performance. In Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications (pp. 223-241). Springer, Cham.
Afrilyasanti, R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2016). Effect of flipped classroom model on Indonesian EFL students’ writing ability across and individual differences in learning. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(5), 65-81.
Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-37.
Ahmed, S. Z. (2016). The flipped classroom model to develop Egyptian EFL students’ listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 12-18.
Alemi, M., & Khatooni, S. (2021). The impacts of virtual reality on young efl learners’ pronunciation. Language Related Research, 11(6), 449-480.
Baker, J. W. (2000). The" classroom flip": Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, 9-17.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip YOUR classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Chiquito, M., Castedo, R., Santos, A. P., López, L. M., & Alarcón, C. (2020). Flipped classroom in engineering: The influence of gender. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 80-89.
Ekmekci, E. (2017). The flipped writing classroom in Turkish EFL context: A comparative study on a new model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 151-167.
Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Chang, A. (2014). To flip or not to flip? That's not the question: exploring flipped instruction in technology supported language learning environments. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 4(2), 1-10.
Eghtesadi Roudi, A. R. (2020). The effectiveness of flipped learning in a testing university classroom: Students’ perceptions, the role of personality traits, and successful intelligence. Applied Research on English Language, 9(3), 349-364.
Farsi, S., Zoghi, M., & Davatgari Asl, H. (2020). The effect of flipped language teaching on EFL learners’ text comprehension: Learners’ English proficiency level in focus. Journal of Language and Translation, 10(4), 49-57.
Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), 1-8.
Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students' flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 295–303.
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1-9.
Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21.
Hung, H.T. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96.
Izadi, S., Najafnezhad, F., & Azizi- Shomami, M. (2020). The effect of flipped classroom approach on academic achievement, learning motivation, sense of belonging, achievement motivation, and self-regulation compared to traditional approach among elementary sixth grade students. Journal of Research in Teaching, 8(3), 2523-282.
Keefe, J. W. (2007). What is personalization? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 217-223.
Kheirabadi, R. (2017). The impact of flipped classroom model on teaching English grammar at 10th grade of high school. Educational Innovations, 16(4), 141-162.
Kim, M., Roh, S., & Ihm, J. (2018). The relationship between non-cognitive student attributes and academic achievements in a flipped learning classroom of a pre-dental science course. Korean journal of medical education, 30(4), 339-346.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Leis, A., Cooke, S., & Tohei, A. (2015). The effects of flipped classrooms on English composition writing in an EFL environment. International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 37–51. doi:10.4018/IJCALLT.2015100103
Liu, M. (2017). The application of a flipped classroom model in modern educational technology. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 27(1-2), 57-71.
Mehring, J. G. (2015). An exploratory study of the lived experiences of Japanese undergraduate EFL
students in the flipped classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University,
Malibu, CA.
Mehring, J. G. (2016). Present research on the flipped classroom and potential tools for the EFL classroom, Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 1-10. DOI:10.1080/07380569.2016.1139912
Muffett, J. (2014). Twelve tips for ‘‘flipping’’ the classroom. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 331-336.
Muzyka, J. L., & Luker, C. S. (2016). Introduction. In J. L. Muzyka & C. S. Luker (Eds.), The flipped classroom volume 1: Background and challenges (pp. 1-8). USA: Oxford University Press.
Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4041-4055.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill House.
Parvaneh, Hamid, Zoghi, Masoud, Asadi, Nader (2020). Flipped Classroom Approach: Its Effect on Learner Autonomy and Language Anxiety of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 330-347.
Rahmatian R.A., & Otroshi M.H. (2007). Considering the role of gender in foreign language learning process. Journal of Human Sciences, 55, 15-26.
Rastegar Khaled, A. (2011). The effect of gender differences on the academic achivement motivation. Women's Strategic Studies, 13(50), 81-124.
Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., & Smith, N. (2017). The flipped classroom: Practice and practices in higher education. Singapore: Springer.
Sahebyar, & Barghi, I. (2021). The Effect of reverse education on goal orientation learning in English language. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 18(41), 1-17.
Sahragard, R., Ziya, M., Razmjoo, A., & Ahmadi, A. (2020). On the development of a tentative model of a flipped classroom instruction and its effect on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ general IELTS writing. Journal of English language Teaching and Learning, 12(26), 239-261.
Sheard, M. (2009). Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 189-204.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Talbert, R. (2017). Flipped learning: A guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Young, C. A., & Moran, C. M. (Eds.). (2017). Applying the flipped classroom model to English language arts education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670.
Language Related Research
Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 74
May and June 2023
Pages 47-77