A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Genre-Based Writing Instruction in English as Foreign Language

Authors
A. Zare-ee 1
T. Khalili 2
1 Associate Professor of English Language and Literature, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
2 Master of Science (MSc) in English Language and Literature, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
Abstract
One of the recent developments in the teaching of writing to second language learners is the genre-based approach which follows the more traditional product- and process-based approaches. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the effects of genre-based instruction (GBI) on writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) have been frequently reported in the last few decades. Findings of these studies are inconclusive and inconsistent. Past research indicates that different populations of language learners may benefit differently from this type of instruction. The present meta-analytic study followed two purposes: a) to explore the average effect of GBI on EFL writing based on both experimental and quasi-experimental studies of the past 26 years and b) to investigate how the variables of writing task type, educational level, and first language possibly moderate the effect of GBI on EFL writing. Four research questions were addressed: a) what is the average effect size of studies on GBI in EFL writing? b) Do EFL writers at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels benefit differently from GBI? C) Does GBI affect different task differently?, and d) Do speakers of different mother tongues benefit differently from GBI? In this meta-analysis, a total number of 255 studies thoroughly searched and collected from various academic websites constituted the original population of studies intended for analysis. Based on careful exclusion and inclusion criteria, 26 (quasi)experimental studies providing 28 effect sizes were included as the final sample. The studies were coded for effect size data and moderator variable indices. The analyses were performed using CMA software. The results of the analyses showed that (1) GBI has a small average effect on EFL writing (Cohen’s d= 0.298); (2) GBI significantly more effective for primary level participants; (3) GBI produced different effects for different task types producing significantly higher effects for paragraph writing, (4) GBI was significantly more effective for learners whose first language was Japanese. The findings of this study can be considered as beneficial issue for both pedagogical and research purposes. The results imply that EFL writing instructors should consider possible moderating variables when choosing their method of writing instruction.

Keywords

  • موسوی، سید ایمان و همکاران ( ۱۳۹۵). «سیر تکاملی آگاهی از ژانر رشتۀ تخصصی با آموزش مهارت­های نگارش دانشگاهی: یک مطالعۀ موردی». جستارهای زبانی. ش 7(3).  صص 171- 196.


 Cheng, A. (2006). “Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction". English                for Specific Purposes. No. 25(1), Pp. 76-89.



  • Chin, C. K. et. al. (2015). “The effect of wiki-based recursive process writing on            Chinese narrative essays for Chinese as a Second Language (CSL) students in Singapore”. The            IAFOR    Journal of Education. No. 3(1). Pp. 45-59.

  • Cohen, J. (1992). “Statistical Power Analysis”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), Pp. 98-101.

  • Duff, P. A.   et al. (2007). “The Future of research synthesis in applied linguistics:          Beyond Art or Science". TESOL Quarterly. Pp. 805-815.

  • Elashri, E. A. E. & I. Ibrahim (2013). “The Effect of the Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Writing on                 the EFL Al-Azhar Secondary Students' Writing Skills and Their Attitudes towards Writing”.         Online Submission. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539137.

  • Flowerdew, J. (2015). “John Swales's approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: a perspective from 25      Years on". Journal of English for Academic Purposes. No. 19,Pp.102-112.

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). “Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research". Educational Researcher. No. 5(10). Pp.3-8.

  • Goldschneider, J. M. & R. M. DeKeyser (2001). “Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme               acquisition” in English: a meta‐analysis of multiple determinants". Language Learning. No. 51(1). Pp.1         -50.

  • Hardy, J. A. & E. Friginal (2016). “Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional Analysis".      Journal of English for Academic Purposes. No. 22, Pp.119-131.

  • Hyland, K. (2007). “Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction". Journal of second Language Writing. No. 16(3). Pp. 148-164.

  • Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum international Publishing.

  • Keck, C.  et al. (2006). “Investigating the empirical link       between task-based interaction and acquisition”. Synthesizing Research on Language Learning      and Teaching. No. 13. Pp. 91.

  • Kroll, B. (1990). Second Language Writing (Cambridge Applied Linguistics): Research Insights for the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kuteeva, M. & R. Negretti (2016). “Graduate students', genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary        practices: Creating a research space across disciplines". English for Specific Purposes. No. 41,Pp. 36            -49.

  • Lee, J. (2013). “Genre-appropriate judgments of qualitative research". Philosophy Of The Social Sciences. No. 44(3). Pp.316-348.

  • Li, S. (2010). “The Effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta‐analysis". Language Learning,                60(2), Pp. 309-365.

  • Littell, J. H. et al.(2008). Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Liu, Y. et. al. (2015). “An application of the process writing approach in          teaching English writing to high school students in China”. HRD Journal. No.6(1). Pp. 140-148.

  • Lo, H. Y. et al. (2014). “Learning how to write effectively for academic journals: a      case study investigating the design and development of a genre-based writing Tutorial System".      Computers & Education. No. 78. Pp. 250-267.

  • Martínez-Flor, A. & S. Usó-Juan  (2006). Current Trends in Teaching of Four Skills. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter     GmbH    & Co.

  • Matsuda, P. K. et. al. (2003). “Changing  currents in second language writing research: a colloquium". Journal of Second Language          Writing. No. 12(2). Pp. 151-179.

  • Matsuda, P. K.  et. al. (2013). “Writing teachers’ perceptions of the presence and          needs of second language writers: an institutional case study". Journal of Second Language              Writing. No. 22(1). Pp. 68-86.

  • Mousavi, S.S.; Gh.Kiani; R. Akbari & R. Ghafarsamar (2017). The evolution of disciplinary genre awareness through academic writing instruction: a case study. Jostarhaye Zabani Bimonthly.  7(3), Pp. 171-196 [In Persian].

  • Nassaji, H. & S. Fotos (2004).“Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar”.                Annual   Review of Applied Linguistics. No. 24. Pp. 126-145.

  • Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega (Eds.). (2006). Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching      (Vol. 13). John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Nueva, J. C. (2010). “Genre-based Instruction: Its Effect on Students’ News Article”. Retrieved June. NO. 12. P., 2017 from :


 ttp://litu.tu.ac.th/FLLT2013/www.fllt2013.org/private_folder/Proceeding/338.pdf.



  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

  • Oswald, F. L. & L. Plonsky (2010). “Meta-analysis in second language research: choices and challenges”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. No. 30. Pp. 85-110.

  • Plonsky, L. (2011). “The Effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta‐analysis".           Language Learning. No. 61(4). Pp. 993-1038.

  • Richards, J. C. & R. Shmidt (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Pearson Education.

  • Rowley-Jolivet, E. & S. Carter-Thomas (2005). “Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy:  manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting. English for Specific Purposes. No. 24(1). Pp. 41-64.

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). “Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. No. 48(1). Pp. 9-18.

  • Swales, J. (1989). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings.            Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University              Press.

  • Yasuda, S. (2011). "Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing Competence". Journal of Second Language             Writing.                 No.20(2), Pp. 111-133.

  • Zhou, D. (2015). "An empirical study on the application of process approach in Non-English majors'      writing". English Language Teaching. No. 8(3), Pp. 89-96.


 



  • Amogne, D. (2013). “Enhancing students writing skills through the genre approach”. International Journal of      English and Literature. No. 4(5), Pp. 242-248.

  • Brown, G. T. & J. C. Marshall (2012). “The impact of training students how to write introductions for      academic essays: An exploratory, longitudinal study”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher              Education. No. 37(6), Pp. 653-670.

  • Chen, Y. S. & S. W. Su (2012). “A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing”. ELT journal. No.66(2),Pp. 184-192.

  • Elashri, E. A. E. & I. Ibrahim (2013). “The Effect of the genre-based approach to teaching writing on the               EFL Al-Azhar secondary students' writing skills and their attitudes towards writing". Online  Submission.

  • Ellis, R.   et al. (1998).“ An evaluation of a genre‐based       approach to the teaching of EAP/ESP writing". TESOL, Quarterly. No. 32(1), Pp. 147-156.

  • Henry, A. (2007). “Evaluating language learners’ response to web-based, data-driven, genre teaching     materials”. English for Specific Purposes. No. 26(4),Pp. 462-484.

  • Henry, A. & R. L. Roseberry (1999). “Raising awareness of the generic structure and linguistic features of              essay introductions”. Language Awareness. No. 8(3-4),Pp. 190-200.

  • Horverak, M. O. (2016, September). “An experimental study on the effect of systemic functional linguistics         applied through a genre-pedagogy approach to teaching writing”. Yearbook of the Poznan         Linguistic Meeting. vol. 2. No. 1,Pp. 67-89.

  • Kalali, N. N. & K. Pishkar (2015). “Genre analysis and writing skill: improving Iranian EFL learners         writing performance through the tenets of genre analysis". Advances in Language and Literary    Studies. No. 6(6), Pp. 119-130.

  • Lee, K. (2006). “The effect of genre-based instruction: improving English writing ability in the classroom".             English the Teaching Anseonggun. No. 61(1). P. 257

  • Lo, H. Y. et al. (2014). “Learning how to write effectively for academic journals: A case            study investigating the design and development of a genre-based writing tutorial system”        Computers & Education. No. 78, Pp. 250-267.

  • Manzouri, H. A. & A. Shahraki, (2014), “The effects of raising EFL students’ genre consciousness “. The Iranian EFL Journal. No. 12. p. 232.

  • Matsuo, C. & G. Bevan (2006). “Two approaches to genre-based writing instruction: a comparative       study". Fukuoka University Review of Literature & Humanities. No. 38(1), Pp. 155-195.

  • Mirzaii, M. & R. B. Aliabadi (2013). “Direct and indirect written corrective feedback in the context of     genre-based instruction on job application letter writing”. Journal of Writing Research. No. 5(2), Pp. 191      -213.

  • Naghdipour, B. & S. Koç (2015). “The evaluation of a teaching intervention in Iranian EFL writing". The               Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. No. 24(2), Pp. 389-398.

  • Nueva, J. C. (2010). “Genre-based instruction: Its effect on students’ news article”. Retrieved June. No. 12. P.      2013.

  • Osman, H. (2004). “Genre-based instruction for ESP”. The English Teacher. No. 33, Pp. 13-29.

  • Rashidi, N. & G. Mazdayasna (2016). “Impact of genre-based instruction on development of Students’                letter writing skills: The case of Textile Engineering Students”. Research in Applied Linguistics. No.7(2), Pp. 55-72.

  • Rezvani, P. et al.(2015). The Effect of Scaffolding Genre-based Instruction of               Narrative Texts on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Performance.

  • Sabouri, H. et al. (2014). “Genre-based approach to teaching writing in EFL context". Genre. No. 3(1),Pp. 10-70.

  • Salehpour, S. & M. Saeidi (2016). “The Effect of Genre-based Scaffolding on Research Paper Writing of               MA Candidates in an EFL Context”. The Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(15), Pp.  91-112.

  • Smit, J.  et al. (2016). “Using genre pedagogy to promote student      proficiency in the language required for interpreting line graphs". Mathematics Education              Research Journal. No. 28(3),Pp. 457-478.

  • Troyan, F. J. (2013). Investigating a genre-based approach to writing in an elementary Spanish program            (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).

  • Tsou, W. & V. Lin (2013). “The effects of genre-based writing instruction on college English academic    literacy". Bulletin of Educational Research. No. 59 (2), Pp.      115-151.

  • Yasuda, S. (2011). “Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness,                linguistic knowledge, and writing competence”. Journal of Second Language Writing. No. 20(2),Pp.111      -133.

  • Zare-ee, A. (2009). “The effects of teaching genre moves on EFL learners’ performance in letter writing”. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji. No. 49,Pp. 43-64.

Language Related Research
Volume 8, Issue 5
November and December 2017
Pages 107-137